LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 134 › Logical Reasoning › Question 17

LSAT 134 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q17

LSAT Preptest 134 explanations

LR Question 17 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Science writer: The deterioration of cognitive faculties…

QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen

CONCLUSION: Microglia (immune cells in the brain) cause Alzheimer’s.

REASONING: Microglia attack the proteins that build up during Alzheimer’s, poisoning the brain in the process. Also, acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) can slow Alzheimer’s, but we’re not told how.

ANALYSIS: Part of the argument is okay. If microglia release poison when removing proteins from the brain, then maybe this could cause Alzheimer’s. This doesn’t prove the conclusion, but at least it shows how the brain could get hurt. We could strengthen this part of the argument by showing that microglia’s removal of PA proteins is the actual cause of Alzheimer’s.

But what does Aspirin have to do with it? The argument didn’t say how anti-inflammatories prove that microglia cause Alzheimer’s. We can strengthen the argument by showing how Aspirin proves that microglia cause Alzheimer’s. The right answer tells us that Aspirin reduces the amount of immune cells in the brain.

This is a hard question, with unfamiliar words. Note that I had to read this 2.5 times before I looked at the answer choices. If you read this, felt confused, but looked at the answer choices anyway, you made the mistake the LSAC wanted you to make.

The answers choices are no good to you if you don’t understand what you’ve read. You should always reread any stimulus you don’t understand. Even a quick look-over can do wonders for your understanding of the question.

___________

  1. This explains why proteins buildup in the brain, but it doesn’t prove that microglia cause Alzheimer’s. It’s true that microglia are part of the brain’s immune system, but maybe another part of the system causes the protein buildup. This also doesn’t help prove that PA proteins are part of the real cause of Alzheimer’s.
  2. CORRECT. Microglia are immune cells in the brain. If Acetylsalicylic acid gets rid of them and improves Alzheimer’s then maybe microglia are a cause of Alzheimer’s. It’s still weak evidence, but this at least explains why the argument mentioned Acetylsalicylic acid.
  3. This might slightly weaken the argument. The argument said Alzheimer’s patients suffer from a buildup of BA protein. This answer means that microglia help effectively combat one symptom of Alzheimer’s. We already know that microglia poison the brain, but this answer suggests there’s at least one benefit to the poisoning.
  4. This suggests that BA might be the cause of Alzheimer’s. So maybe microglia do the brain a favor by getting rid of BA, even if they have to use a bit of poison. This weakens the argument, slightly.
  5. So? This doesn’t tell us if microglia cause those diseases or whether the microglia are helping fight the diseases.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 134
Next Question

More Resources for Strengthen Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Strengthen questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers strengthen questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. David says

    October 27, 2021 at 3:29 pm

    Different analysis of D here: It seems to me it would strengthen the argument because it gives a mechanism for cognitive decline (which the prompt does not), but it says “directly” rather than “associated with Alzheimers”–am I wrong?

    Reply
    • Orion (LSATHacks) says Member

      November 23, 2021 at 1:44 pm

      The conclusion of the argument in the stimulus is that the cognitive deterioration is caused by microglia. The argument supports this by saying microglia damage the brain while removing BA deposits.

      If the BA deposits are causing the damage to cognitive function, the microglia are less responsible so the argument’s conclusion is weakened. So while you’re right that it gives a mechanism for cognitive decline, it’s not the mechanism that the argument is concluding, so the conclusion is weaker.

      Reply
  2. David says

    October 13, 2018 at 11:19 pm

    “it doesn’t prove that microglia cause Alzheimer’s.”
    “This also doesn’t help prove that PA proteins are part of the real cause of Alzheimer’s.”

    Hi Graeme, I’m not sure how you got to this. The way I see it is as follows

    Deficiency in Brains Immune System Causes Brain’s Inability to Eliminate BA Proteins, which causes Microglia to attack these Protein Deposits according to the stimulus, which causes Deterioration of the Brain associated with Alzheimers.

    How does this not prove that Microglia causes Alzheimers .. when the premise literally says Micgoglia’s attack causes the deterioration of the brain?

    Reply
    • Orion (LSATHacks) says Member

      November 23, 2021 at 1:51 pm

      The stimulus is arguing that Alzheimer’s is caused by the activities of microglia. Answer A (saying that the buildup is due to an immune deficiency) doesn’t actually contribute to this argument.

      Providing an explanation for the buildup doesn’t strengthen the idea that microglial response to the buildup causes the cognitive deficiency we see in Alzheimer’s patients.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms