LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 134 › Logical Reasoning › Question 3

LSAT 134 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q3

LSAT Preptest 134 explanations

LR Question 3 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Engine noise from boats travelling through killer…

QUESTION TYPE: Complete The Argument

CONCLUSION: Boats affect killer whales’ hearing. (my guess at the conclusion)

REASONING: Engine noise is on the same frequency as killer whales’ hearing. And it can be loud enough to hurt their hearing.

ANALYSIS: If whales scream at frequencies between 100-3000 hertz, they must be able to hear at those frequencies. And the boats engines make noise on those frequencies that is loud enough to damage whales’ hearing.

So it’s reasonable to conclude that the engines affect whales ability to communicate, either by hurting their hearing or by drowning out their screams.

___________

  1. The argument never says whether younger or older whales are most affected.
  2. The argument says whales don’t seem to behave differently when boats pass overhead. So maybe they do try to communicate just as often.
  3. CORRECT. The whole argument is leading to this point. It’s less specific than B, which makes it more likely to be correct. We don’t know exactly how whales’ communication is impaired, but the boat engines probably make things difficult. The engines make noise on the same frequency as whale screams, and the noise is so loud that it hurts hearing.
  4. We have no idea where whales will be. Maybe their best feeding grounds also happen to be beneath shipping lanes.
  5. Who knows? Maybe the engines confuse fish, and make it easier for whales to eat them.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 134
Next Question

More Resources for Complete the Argument Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Complete the Argument questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers complete the argument questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms