LSAT 134 | Section 4 | Reading Comprehension: Q1

RC Question 1 Explanation

DISCUSSION: For main point questions, ask yourself: why did they tell me that? LSAT passages always have a point. Here, the point is that the two plans to deal with crime are really just opposite sides of the same coin.

___________

1. This is true, according to the passage, but it isn’t the main point. This answer ignores the fact that utility maximization theory will let us settle the debate.
2. The passage’s point was broader. Utility maximization theory can be used to settle the debate between the two camps.
3. The point was that utility maximization theory could settle the debate between the two sides. Quantification of effects wasn’t mentioned.
4. CORRECT. Utility maximization theory lets us see that both sides are right. Deterrence and better opportunities are both important for stopping crime. 
5. Utility maximization theory demonstrates this is wrong. Norms and institutions affect whether someone will commit a crime. If no one gives you a job, your business idea fails and the government won’t give you money, you may be tempted to steal rather than starve.