LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 134 › Reading Comprehension › Question 25

LSAT 134 | Section 4 | Reading Comprehension: Q25

LSAT Preptest 134 explanations

RC Question 25 Explanation

DISCUSSION: The critics from lines 3-4 are never mentioned again, so we have to base our answers on Dostoyevsky’s opinions. While Dostoyevsky did use fantasy, lines 10-12 show that he was a realist. He wouldn’t have liked the idea of standing above the present and mundane reality.

Note that the critics from lines 3-4 never mention fantasy. Standing above the present doesn’t necessarily refer to fantasy. It could refer, for example, to only writing heroic descriptions of important, real events from Russia’s history.

___________

  1. The critics from lines 3-4 never said anything about the fantastic. They said art should stand above the present. Those aren’t necessarily the same thing.
  2. Dostoyevsky does think that reality is more than just the everyday. But line 10 makes clear that Dostoyevsky was a realist. He didn’t think art should stand above reality. 
  3. CORRECT. Lines 10-12 support this. Even though Dostoyevsky used fantasy, he thought literature must be grounded in reality.
  4. Lines 3-4 never mention fantasy. So we have no idea whether or not the idealist critics made such a distinction.
  5. This describes the view of the critics from lines 5-9. We’re talking about the critics from lines 3-4.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 134
Next Question
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Fred Little says

    July 20, 2022 at 5:57 pm

    Lines 13-14 state, “for Dostoyevsky there was no distinction in principle between fantasy and reality”. Wouldn’t that imply that he viewed the art above everyday camp as necessarily being based in reality?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms