LSAT 65, Logical Reasoning II, Q19, LSATHacks

LR Question 19 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: Consumer advocate: In some countries, certain produce…

QUESTION TYPE: Weaken – Exception

CONCLUSION: There are reasons to avoid irradiated foods.

REASONING: 

1. Irradiated food is exposed to radioactive substances.
2. irradiation reduces vitamin content and leaves behind residues.
3. Irradiation produces radiolytic products which can cause cancer.

ANALYSIS: You can weaken the argument by showing that the listed reasons aren’t really problems.

You can also weaken the argument by showing that irradiation produces benefits that outweigh the harm it causes.

___________

1. This shows that the third problem is unlikely to apply in the case of irradiated food.
2. CORRECT. This just shows that irradiation isn’t the only cause of cancer. But irradiation could still dangerous.
    
   Likewise, falling off a cliff isn’t the only possible cause of death. But you still shouldn’t walk off cliffs.
3. The second reason said that irradiation can reduce the vitamin content of foods. This shows that that rarely happens.
4. This shows that irradiation may actually reduce the amount of harmful chemicals in food.
5. This shows a lack of correlation between irradiated food and cancer. That reduces the odds that irradiated food causes cancer.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.