LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 135 › Logical Reasoning › Question 19

LSAT 135 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q19

LSAT Preptest 135 explanations

LR Question 19 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Consumer advocate: In some countries, certain produce…

QUESTION TYPE: Weaken – Exception

CONCLUSION: There are reasons to avoid irradiated foods.

REASONING:

  1. Irradiated food is exposed to radioactive substances.
  2. irradiation reduces vitamin content and leaves behind residues.
  3. Irradiation produces radiolytic products which can cause cancer.

ANALYSIS: You can weaken the argument by showing that the listed reasons aren’t really problems.

You can also weaken the argument by showing that irradiation produces benefits that outweigh the harm it causes.

___________

  1. This shows that the third problem is unlikely to apply in the case of irradiated food.
  2. CORRECT. This just shows that irradiation isn’t the only cause of cancer. But irradiation could still dangerous.
     
    Likewise, falling off a cliff isn’t the only possible cause of death. But you still shouldn’t walk off cliffs.
  3. The second reason said that irradiation can reduce the vitamin content of foods. This shows that that rarely happens.
  4. This shows that irradiation may actually reduce the amount of harmful chemicals in food.
  5. This shows a lack of correlation between irradiated food and cancer. That reduces the odds that irradiated food causes cancer.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 135
Next Question

More Resources for Weaken Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Weaken questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers weaken questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Rachel says

    October 25, 2016 at 6:18 am

    I’m so confused, isn’t weaken except mean to strengthen? If so b dsent strengthen at all.

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      November 1, 2016 at 1:10 pm

      “Weaken except” can also mean that it neither weakens nor strengthens the argument. In general, the opposite of something on the LSAT doesn’t have to be the polar opposite, e.g. not hot doesn’t mean cold, it could mean lukewarm. It could just be a state that isn’t hot.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms