LSAT 65, Logical Reasoning II, Q4, LSATHacks

LR Question 4 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: Gaby: In school, children should be allowed fully to…

QUESTION TYPE: Point At Issue

ARGUMENTS: Gaby says children should follow their own interests, supported minimally by experienced teachers.

Logan says children should learn fundamentals in a disciplined, systemic way.

ANALYSIS: Gaby and Logan disagree on what kind of structure children should have. 

Gaby thinks there should be little structure, and Logan thinks there should be much structure. They also disagree on who should set the curriculum: children or teachers.

___________

1. Gaby doesn’t mention fundamentals.
2. CORRECT. Gaby thinks teachers should offer almost no direction. Logan thinks education should be highly structured.
3. They both agree children should have access to good teachers.
4. Neither of them mentions the school environment, as such. School environment is not the same thing as teaching style.
5. Neither Gaby nor Logan mentions whether children have any interest in fundamentals.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.