LSAT 66, Logical Reasoning I, Q13, LSATHacks

LR Question 13 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: Brooks: I'm unhappy in my job, but I don't know…

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Morgenstern says Brooks should quit.

REASONING: The main risk to quitting is not finding another job, in which case Brooks would be unhappy. But Brooks is already unhappy.

ANALYSIS: Morgenstern forgets that there are degrees of unhappiness.

You might dislike a job. But you might dislike not finding another job and being a hobo even more.

(I actually recommend leaving jobs you don’t like. You’re not likely to become a hobo. But that’s another story.)

___________

1. CORRECT. Sure, you dislike your job. But, you might be much more unhappy if you couldn’t find another job.
2. This is code for circular reasoning. Morgenstern did have (flawed) evidence: Brook’s greatest fear has already happened.
   (according to Morgenstern)
   So the argument isn’t circular.
3. Morgenstern was pretty accurate about what Brooks said. Brooks did say he’s unhappy, and Morgenstern correctly identified Brooks’ main worry: not finding another job.
4. There’s only one type of risk here: not finding another job. Being unhappy in Brooks’ job isn’t a risk, it’s a certainty. He’s already unhappy.
5. Morgenstern didn’t say that everyone who is unhappy should quit their job. He just said that Brooks should. That’s not a generalization.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.