LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 136 › Logical Reasoning › Question 13

LSAT 136 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q13

LSAT Preptest 136 explanations

LR Question 13 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Brooks: I’m unhappy in my job, but I don’t know…

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Morgenstern says Brooks should quit.

REASONING: The main risk to quitting is not finding another job, in which case Brooks would be unhappy. But Brooks is already unhappy.

ANALYSIS: Morgenstern forgets that there are degrees of unhappiness.

You might dislike a job. But you might dislike not finding another job and being a hobo even more.

(I actually recommend leaving jobs you don’t like. You’re not likely to become a hobo. But that’s another story.)

___________

  1. CORRECT. Sure, you dislike your job. But, you might be much more unhappy if you couldn’t find another job.
  2. This is code for circular reasoning. Morgenstern did have (flawed) evidence: Brook’s greatest fear has already happened.
    (according to Morgenstern)
    So the argument isn’t circular.
  3. Morgenstern was pretty accurate about what Brooks said. Brooks did say he’s unhappy, and Morgenstern correctly identified Brooks’ main worry: not finding another job.
  4. There’s only one type of risk here: not finding another job. Being unhappy in Brooks’ job isn’t a risk, it’s a certainty. He’s already unhappy.
  5. Morgenstern didn’t say that everyone who is unhappy should quit their job. He just said that Brooks should. That’s not a generalization.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 136
Next Question

More Resources for Flaw Questions

  • Flaw drills: Use these to practice making examples of abstract flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flaw questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flaw questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. manjot says

    August 31, 2017 at 3:32 pm

    I’m still not sure why the advice isn’t circular. Could you please explain?

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      September 3, 2017 at 4:36 pm

      When you use circular reasoning, your conclusion is contained within your reasoning, i.e. your evidence is your conclusion and vice versa. The explanation points out that there actually is a distinction between the evidence and conclusion here, even if that evidence is flawed. The argument is:
      Premise: If you don’t find a job, you’re going to be unhappy
      Premise: You’re already unhappy
      Conclusion: You should quit.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms