LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 144 › Logical Reasoning › Question 4

LSAT 144 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q4

LSAT Preptest 144 explanations

LR Question 4 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: James: Community colleges, by their very nature…

QUESTION TYPE: Point At Issue

ARGUMENTS: James says that community colleges meet the educational needs of their communities, and universities don’t.

Margaret says that universities work to serve the communities they’re located in. People attend college and university to get a job.

ANALYSIS: This question shifts terms frequently. James says community colleges ‘work towards’ serving their communities. You can assume that this is the same thing as ‘having a goal’, which is the language that Margaret uses.

Many topics are only mentioned by one author. For instance, Margaret tells us nothing about the goals of community colleges. And James doesn’t tell us why people go to school, so the last half of Margaret’s argument is irrelevant.

James says ‘educational needs’ and Margaret simply says ‘needs’. These aren’t the same thing; this seems like a minor flaw since the credited answer talks about educational needs. However, the question stem just says ‘most support’, so we don’t need 100% proof of disagreement.

___________

  1. CORRECT. James says community colleges work towards this, but universities don’t. Margaret says universities want to serve the needs of their communities. Presumably this includes educational needs.
  2. Neither James nor Margaret says whether universities serve educational needs in practice. They both talk about goals, while this answer is about what actually happens.
  3. James doesn’t say why people go to university.
  4. James doesn’t mention the primary educational need in a community, so how could he disagree? For that matter, Margaret also doesn’t say what a community’s main need is.
  5. Margaret agrees, but James has no opinion on this point. So they can’t disagree.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 144
Next Question

More Resources for Point at Issue Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Point at Issue questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers point at issue questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. John Reagan says

    July 22, 2018 at 1:49 pm

    I really appreciate your explanations. Thanks to you I’ve reached a higher level of thinking on the LSAT.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms