• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

LSAT Hacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • Start Here
    • About
  • LSAT Explanations
  • LSATHacks Pro
  • Course
  • Mastery seminars
  • Tutoring
  • Books
  • Login
LSAT Explanations » LSAT Preptest 70 » Logical Reasoning 1 » Question 9

LSAT 70, Logical Reasoning I, Q9

LSAT 70 Explanations

LR Question 9 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Astronomer: Proponents of the hypothesis that life …

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: There is good reason to think that the hypothesis is false.

REASONING: There’s no evidence for the hypothesis.

ANALYSIS: I intentionally simplified the conclusion and reasoning to make the error clearer. You can’t conclude that something is wrong just because there’s no evidence to support it. To prove that something is wrong you need actual evidence against it.

The astronomer only has lack of evidence. He should have concluded “I don’t know if the hypothesis is right or wrong. I have no evidence for or against it.”

Instead, he assumes that the hypothesis is wrong. When you have no evidence, you can’t do that. You have to say “I don’t know”. Something can be right even if you currently lack evidence that it is.

Don’t let the science talk frighten you. Almost all of it is fluff. The entire argument is in the final sentence.

___________

  1. CORRECT. The astronomer says there is ‘good reason’ to think that the hypothesis is false. Good reason = evidence. Why does the astronomer think that there is evidence against the hypothesis? In the final sentence, his only proof is that there is no evidence for the hypothesis.
  2. The astronomer didn’t say that the hypothesis is inherently implausible. He just said that there’s currently no evidence for it.
  3. The astronomer didn’t mention any hypothesis that is equally likely to be true.
  4. Which premises contradict the conclusion? If the flaw didn’t happen, then an answer can’t be correct.
  5. This isn’t a flaw. If your opponent makes a true claim, then you must grant that it’s true, even if it weakens your argument.

Previous Question
Table Of Contents
Next Question




Free Logical Reasoning lesson

Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I created LSATHacks, and scored a 177 on the LSAT.

You should check out LSATHacks Pro

LSATHacks Pro has explanations for 6300+ LSAT questions, and over 50 hours of courses. All for $49.99/month. Join the club and I'll teach you how to think like a 170+ scorer.

LSATHacks Pro comes with a ten-day moneyback guarantee. You can find more reviews on the LSAT mastery seminars page. Many have seen improvement within a few days!
---------
Photos and Updates: If you have a question, you can follow us on Instagram here or send an email.

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


New! LSATHacks Pro: Get every course on LSATHacks for $49.99/month

LSATHacks Pro

Get a higher score with LSATHacks Pro

LSAT Course, LSAT Mastery seminars, and 3,000 extra explanations. All for $49.99/month, satisfaction guaranteed, no minimum commitment. Sign up here: https://lsathacks.com/lsathacks-pro/

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

© Copyright 2022 LSAT Hacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal

Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.
×
Item Added to your Cart!
There are no products
Continue Shopping