LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 141 › Reading Comprehension › Question 26

LSAT 141 | Section 3 | Reading Comprehension: Q26

LSAT Preptest 141 explanations

RC Question 26 Explanation

DISCUSSION: As with the other specific detail questions on this passage, you can and should support the right answer using a few lines from the passage.

The wrong answers all refer to concepts out of context. They’re intended to trick you, if your understanding of the passage was incomplete.

___________

  1. This is very extreme. Any activity could involve a loss of human life….even getting out of bed!
    The author doesn’t necessarily think that every activity must be made safer. Especially since we have a limited budget (2nd & 3rd line of the fourth paragraph).
  2. CORRECT. The second sentence of the second paragraph supports this. Most risks are voluntary to a certain degree, including environmental risks. Presumably some environmental risks are therefore risky to a greater degree than others.
  3. It’s true that the author supports policy experts. The author thinks experts are right that we should focus on saving lives.
    But the author doesn’t think that experts are necessarily any good at judging what is voluntary. The point of the passage is that voluntariness is not important.
  4. The 2nd & 3rd line of the fourth paragraph says that we have limited resources. The author did not say whether those resources should be increased.
  5. Actually, the author spends two paragraphs trashing the beliefs of ordinary people. We ordinary folk focus on voluntariness, but voluntariness is not a useful concept. Nowhere does the author say that it’s important to listen to us regular people.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 141
Next Question
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Raziel Kohanbash says

    July 27, 2018 at 5:25 pm

    Hey! Regarding LSAT 70– Section 2, Q. 27 the author uses the term “may” in the passage, but the answer choice uses a definitive term “are”… how do we know he/she 100% agrees with the statement?

    Thank you!

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      August 19, 2018 at 9:56 pm

      The author uses the term “may” to refer to certain cases, e.g. collision with an asteroid. However, they also indicate that “with most environmental, occupational, and other social risks, it’s not an all-or-nothing matter, but one of degree.” That’s a very definitive statement: some environmental risks are incurred with a greater degree of voluntariness than others. That’s why (B) is correct.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms