LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 140 › Logical Reasoning › Question 21

LSAT 140 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q21

LSAT Preptest 140 explanations

LR Question 21 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Lawyer: If you take something that you have good…

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: It wasn’t wrong for Meyers to take the compost.

REASONING: The lawyer said Meyers didn’t meet a sufficient condition for something being wrong.

ANALYSIS: This flaw question uses conditional reasoning. When a flaw questions uses conditional reasoning, there are only two possible errors. I’ll use a sample sentence to demonstrate them: All cats have tails (C ➞ T)

  • Incorrect negation (Not cat, so no tail C ➞ T)
  • Incorrect reversal (Has a tail, so is cat T ➞ C)

If you see conditional reasoning on a flaw question, assume they’ve done one of these two errors. Drawing isn’t necessary. You just need to see whether they reversed or negated, then look for that answer. That said, here’s the drawing:

Good reason ➞ Stealing ➞ Wrong
The lawyer incorrectly negated good reason: G ➞ W

___________

  1. This is different. A fact is a fact. A moral judgment is an idea about a fact (e.g. it’s good, it’s bad, we should, we shouldn’t)
    Example of flaw: You pointed out that millions of children are starving. How dare you say it is fine that millions of children are starving?
  2. This answer describes a hypothetical situation. The lawyer was talking about what actually happened. The lawyer didn’t say what would happen if Meyers thought the compost was someone’s property.
  3. CORRECT. This describes an incorrect negation. “A condition by itself enough….” is a sufficient condition. The argument assumed this sufficient condition was also necessary.
  4. This isn’t a flaw! If the compost was Meyers’ property, it would have been fine for him to take it, and he wouldn’t need a lawyer!
  5. This is a different flaw.
    Example of flaw: Mrs. Jones said the compost was hers. This is possible. Therefore it is certain that the compost belongs to Mrs. Jones!

Recap: The question begins with “Lawyer: If you take something that you”. It is a Flawed Reasoning question. To practice more Flawed Reasoning questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 140
Next Question

More Resources for Flaw Questions

  • Flaw drills: Use these to practice making examples of abstract flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flaw questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flaw questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms