LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 140 › Logical Reasoning › Question 9

LSAT 140 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q9

LSAT Preptest 140 explanations

LR Question 9 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Records from 1850 to 1900 show that in a certain…

QUESTION TYPE: Method of Reasoning

CONCLUSION: A baby’s health depends on how much food the mother gets while she is pregnant.

REASONING: There was a correlation between babies’ birth weights and the success of crops the year before.

ANALYSIS: This argument has two flaws. First, it uses evidence from a correlation to prove causation. This never works. Second, it switches terms inappropriately. Stop – before reading this explanation, look at the reasoning and conclusion again – try to spot the shifts in terms.

Did you find it? The argument switches from birth weight to health and from crop success to food access. These shifts aren’t warranted. First, birth weights. A higher birth weight doesn’t necessarily mean a baby is healthier. The argument should have made this explicit.

Second, crop success. Maybe crop success doesn’t lead to more food for mothers. This could be a region of farmers. When crops succeed, the mothers are richer, less stressed, etc. But perhaps they normally have enough food either way.

___________

  1. CORRECT. See the explanation above. The “claimed correlation” is between birth weights and crops. The causal relation is between health and food access.
  2. An example of this would be “….therefore, babies’ birth weights are only affected by crop success”. The argument didn’t say anything like that.
  3. An example of this would be “….since there used to be a correlation between crops and birth weights, there is still such a correlation.”
  4. An example of this would be “….because birth weights and crop records are linked, there must be a common cause. Maybe weather explains both crop success and heavier birth weights.”
  5. There are two reasons this is wrong. First, the argument didn’t explain any causal relations. Second, there aren’t two causal relations! The relation between crop success and birth weights is just a correlation.

Recap: The question begins with “Records from 1850 to 1900 show that”. It is a Method of Reasoning question. To practice more Method of Reasoning questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 140
Next Question

More Resources for Method of Reasoning Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Method of Reasoning questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers method of reasoning questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Paul says

    April 4, 2021 at 8:50 pm

    Hwhha I feel so foolish for getting this one wrong. I saw that the data set was from 1850 to 1900 and switched answers from A to C, even though no emphasis is placed on the fact that the data set was from the past. Lol, what data set ISNT from the past? This reminds me of another LR question concerning iguanas floating on debris as a method of migrating from one continent to another. Like then, I am literally laughing out loud upon reading the explanation.

    Sigh… good to have a good chuckle now and then to give LSAT prep a bit of lighthearted brevity.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms