QUESTION TEXT: Records from 1850 to 1900 show that…
QUESTION TYPE: Method of Reasoning
CONCLUSION: A baby’s health depends on how much food the mother gets while she is pregnant.
REASONING: There was a correlation between babies’ birth weights and the success of crops the year before.
ANALYSIS: This argument has two flaws. First, it uses evidence from a correlation to prove causation. This never works. Second, it switches terms inappropriately. Stop – before reading this explanation, look at the reasoning and conclusion again – try to spot the shifts in terms.
Did you find it? The argument switches from birth weight to health and from crop success to food access. These shifts aren’t warranted. First, birth weights. A higher birth weight doesn’t necessarily mean a baby is healthier. The argument should have made this explicit.
Second, crop success. Maybe crop success doesn’t lead to more food for mothers. This could be a region of farmers. When crops succeed, the mothers are richer, less stressed, etc. But perhaps they normally have enough food either way.
___________
- CORRECT. See the explanation above. The “claimed correlation” is between birth weights and crops. The causal relation is between health and food access.
- An example of this would be “….therefore, babies’ birth weights are only affected by crop success”. The argument didn’t say anything like that.
- An example of this would be “….since there used to be a correlation between crops and birth weights, there is still such a correlation.”
- An example of this would be “….because birth weights and crop records are linked, there must be a common cause. Maybe weather explains both crop success and heavier birth weights.”
- There are two reasons this is wrong. First, the argument didn’t explain any causal relations. Second, there aren’t two causal relations! The relation between crop success and birth weights is just a correlation.
Recap: The question begins with “Records from 1850 to 1900 show that”. It is a Method of Reasoning question. To practice more Method of Reasoning questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.
Free Logical Reasoning lesson
Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions
Paul says
Hwhha I feel so foolish for getting this one wrong. I saw that the data set was from 1850 to 1900 and switched answers from A to C, even though no emphasis is placed on the fact that the data set was from the past. Lol, what data set ISNT from the past? This reminds me of another LR question concerning iguanas floating on debris as a method of migrating from one continent to another. Like then, I am literally laughing out loud upon reading the explanation.
Sigh… good to have a good chuckle now and then to give LSAT prep a bit of lighthearted brevity.