LSATHacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • LSAT Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Mastery Courses
  • Login
  •   Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 73 › Logical Reasoning 2 › The only songs Amanda has ever written are | LSAT 73, Q21, LSATHacks

The only songs Amanda has ever written are | LSAT 73, Q21, LSATHacks

LSAT 73 Explanations

LR Question 21 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: The only songs Amanda has ever written are blues songs…

QUESTION TYPE: Parallel Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Amanda’s next song probably won’t have more than three chords if it’s not a blues song.

REASONING: Amanda has only written punk rock and blues songs. Most punk songs don’t have more than three chords.

ANALYSIS: This isn’t a rock solid argument, but it’s fairly well supported. The author ignores a third possibility: Amanda might write a song that isn’t punk or blues. But since Amanda has never done that, it’s unlikely.

To parallel this argument, you need to match the structure. A formal diagram isn’t useful, but you should be clear on the elements.

  1. All have been either A or B
  2. B is usually not Y
  3. If next one is not A, then probably not Y.

In practice, I skimmed the answers and eliminated those that obviously differed from the structure above. Then I focussed more closely on the two that seemed to match (C and E).

All of the answers use the same terms. They refer to a family named the Guptas, who own pets: parrots and fish. The parrots are noisy.

Despite the similar subject matter, all of the answers are different. Questions like this reward you for focussing on structural factors.

Note that there are many ways of phrasing the idea that all pets owned by the Guptas were fish or parrots. The answers all phrase this idea in different ways, but the statements are logically equivalent.

___________

  1. This has the wrong structure. It should have said “If the next is not A”.
    1. All have been either A or B
    2. B is usually Y.
    3. If the next is B, it will probably be Y.
  2. This has the wrong structure. It should have said “if not A, probably Y”.
    1. All have been either A or B
    2. B is usually Y.
    3. If Y, probably B.
  3. This is close, but it’s not quite the same. E is better. This doesn’t say “the next”. Instead, it’s talking about all pets.
    1. All have been either A or B
    2. B is usually Y.
    3. Any that is not A will probably Y.
  4. This has the wrong structure.
    1. All have been either A or B
    2. B is usually Y.
    3. If next is not B, probably not Y.
  5. CORRECT. This matches exactly.
    1. Either A or B.
    2. B is usually Y.
    3. If next one is not A, it will probably be Y.

     
    Note: The fact that the stimulus said “not involve” and this said “will be noisy” is not significant. Putting things in terms of “not” isn’t a structural issue, since you can put any “not” statement in a positive form. For example, you could say “noisy” = “not quiet.”
     
    Don’t focus on words like “not”. Focus instead on whether a key term was or was not negated. In this argument, Y wasn’t negated in the stimulus or in the correct answer.

Previous Question
PT 73 /  PT 141
Next Question

More Resources for Parallel Reasoning Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Parallel Reasoning questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers parallel reasoning questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Free Five Part LSAT Email Course

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. David Panscik says

    April 1, 2021 at 4:57 pm

    E is not correct. It does not match exactly. E contains an additional parameter that is not included in the passage. “if it is not a fish” is the extra parameter that makes E not a correct answer.

    Reply
    • Founder Graeme Blake says

      April 15, 2024 at 9:58 pm

      If it is not a fish matches to “if it is not a blues song”.

      It’s best not to argue with right answers. If an LSAT answer seems wrong to you that is a sign you have missed something.

      Note: This is an old comment but I wanted to clarify the point.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Ultimate Bundle

Get the LSATHacks Mastery seminars, the Intro Course, the LSATHacks Mastery Toolkit and a Strategy Call. All for only $499, satisfaction guaranteed.

Buy now

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial
  • FAQ/Legal

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2025 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal