• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

LSAT Hacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • Start Here
    • About
  • LSAT Explanations
  • LSATHacks Pro
  • Course
  • Mastery seminars
  • Tutoring
  • Books
  • Login
LSAT Explanations » LSAT Preptest 74 » Logical Reasoning 1 » Question 17

LSAT 74, Logical Reasoning I, Q17

LSAT 74 Explanations

LR Question 17 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: How the pigment known as Han purple was…

QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen

CONCLUSION: The ancient Chinese probably discovered Han purple by accident while making glass.

REASONING: The same ingredients and similar processes were used to make white glass and Han purple.

ANALYSIS: The argument has implied that it’s possible that Han purple was discovered during the production of white glass. The makers of white glass were using the right ingredients, and a related process.

But the argument didn’t say if Han purple was invented in a place where white glass was made! If Han purple was invented somewhere without white glass, then the conclusion is almost certainly wrong.

The right answer strengthens the argument by at least showing that white glass could have led to the discovery of Han purple. It restricts the production of Han purple only to an area that also produced white glass.

Note: This is a very hard question. The correct answer is asking you to conceptualize an alternate possibility (that Han purple was discovered in an area without white glass) and then to recognize that answer A eliminates that possibility.

There would have been a simpler way of doing that. Answer A could have said “Han purple was invented in an area where white glass was produced”. But if the right answer had said that, then this question would have been too easy, wouldn’t it?

___________

  1. CORRECT. This eliminates the possibility that white glass and Han purple were produced in completely separate regions.
    Note: This answer would have been equally strong if it said that white glass and Han purple were each produced all over China. The main thing is that it shows the two materials were produced in the same areas, therefore accidental discovery was possible.
  2. This is just an irrelevant fact about how the materials were used. We care about how they were made.
  3. This doesn’t tell us about how Han purple was invented. It tells us how many people knew how to make it after it was invented.
  4. This shows that it would have been easy to make white glass. But that doesn’t prove anything about the production of Han purple.
    For instance, the material to make wheels on suitcases was easily accessible for years, but we didn’t think of the idea. Upright wheeled suitcases were only invented in 1987.
  5. This doesn’t explain anything. Maybe white glass objects were more durable than Han purple objects. Who cares? We’re only interested in what leads to the initial invention of Han purple.

Previous Question
Table Of Contents
Next Question




Free Logical Reasoning lesson

Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I created LSATHacks, and scored a 177 on the LSAT.

You should check out LSATHacks Pro

LSATHacks Pro has explanations for 6300+ LSAT questions, and over 50 hours of courses. All for $49.99/month. Join the club and I'll teach you how to think like a 170+ scorer.

LSATHacks Pro comes with a ten-day moneyback guarantee. You can find more reviews on the LSAT mastery seminars page. Many have seen improvement within a few days!
---------
Photos and Updates: If you have a question, you can follow us on Instagram here or send an email.

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Muskan Sandhu says

    October 1, 2020 at 3:02 am

    Hi Graeme. Thanks very much for the explanations. I’m wondering why is it being assumed that Han purple was formed accidentally while producing glass and not the other way round–glass formed accidentally while producing Han Purple? It doesn’t say that glass predated Han purple, or is that implied by the use of the word “common” for glass?

    Reply
    • TutorRosalie (LSATHacks) says

      October 9, 2020 at 9:11 pm

      So you don’t have to prove the stimulus true on a strengthen question. You just have to strengthen it. A strengthens the link between purple and glass by showing they coexisted: it removes the possibility that Han Purple and white glass were made in different locations. And indeed, the word common does suggest glass predates Han purple. We know glass has been used by cultures worldwide, but Han Purple is unique to that Qin and Han dynasties. If the Chinese had invented glass the author would probably have remarked on that. (That is the kind of deference you give to the stimulus)

      So the question ignores a bigger flaw: it’s possible there wasn’t even a link between Han purple and glass!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


New! LSATHacks Pro: Get every course on LSATHacks for $49.99/month

LSATHacks Pro

Get a higher score with LSATHacks Pro

LSAT Course, LSAT Mastery seminars, and 3,000 extra explanations. All for $49.99/month, satisfaction guaranteed, no minimum commitment. Sign up here: https://lsathacks.com/lsathacks-pro/

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

© Copyright 2022 LSAT Hacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal

Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.
×
Item Added to your Cart!
There are no products
Continue Shopping