LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 142 › Logical Reasoning › Question 17

LSAT 142 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q17

LSAT Preptest 142 explanations

LR Question 17 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: How the pigment known as Han purple was synthesized…

QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen

CONCLUSION: The ancient Chinese probably discovered Han purple by accident while making glass.

REASONING: The same ingredients and similar processes were used to make white glass and Han purple.

ANALYSIS: The argument has implied that it’s possible that Han purple was discovered during the production of white glass. The makers of white glass were using the right ingredients, and a related process.

But the argument didn’t say if Han purple was invented in a place where white glass was made! If Han purple was invented somewhere without white glass, then the conclusion is almost certainly wrong.

The right answer strengthens the argument by at least showing that white glass could have led to the discovery of Han purple. It restricts the production of Han purple only to an area that also produced white glass.

Note: This is a very hard question. The correct answer is asking you to conceptualize an alternate possibility (that Han purple was discovered in an area without white glass) and then to recognize that answer A eliminates that possibility.

There would have been a simpler way of doing that. Answer A could have said “Han purple was invented in an area where white glass was produced”. But if the right answer had said that, then this question would have been too easy, wouldn’t it?

___________

  1. CORRECT. This eliminates the possibility that white glass and Han purple were produced in completely separate regions.
    Note: This answer would have been equally strong if it said that white glass and Han purple were each produced all over China. The main thing is that it shows the two materials were produced in the same areas, therefore accidental discovery was possible.
  2. This is just an irrelevant fact about how the materials were used. We care about how they were made.
  3. This doesn’t tell us about how Han purple was invented. It tells us how many people knew how to make it after it was invented.
  4. This shows that it would have been easy to make white glass. But that doesn’t prove anything about the production of Han purple.
    For instance, the material to make wheels on suitcases was easily accessible for years, but we didn’t think of the idea. Upright wheeled suitcases were only invented in 1987.
  5. This doesn’t explain anything. Maybe white glass objects were more durable than Han purple objects. Who cares? We’re only interested in what leads to the initial invention of Han purple.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 142
Next Question

More Resources for Strengthen Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Strengthen questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers strengthen questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Muskan Sandhu says

    October 1, 2020 at 3:02 am

    Hi Graeme. Thanks very much for the explanations. I’m wondering why is it being assumed that Han purple was formed accidentally while producing glass and not the other way round–glass formed accidentally while producing Han Purple? It doesn’t say that glass predated Han purple, or is that implied by the use of the word “common” for glass?

    Reply
    • Rosalie (LSATHacks) says Tutor

      October 9, 2020 at 9:11 pm

      So you don’t have to prove the stimulus true on a strengthen question. You just have to strengthen it. A strengthens the link between purple and glass by showing they coexisted: it removes the possibility that Han Purple and white glass were made in different locations. And indeed, the word common does suggest glass predates Han purple. We know glass has been used by cultures worldwide, but Han Purple is unique to that Qin and Han dynasties. If the Chinese had invented glass the author would probably have remarked on that. (That is the kind of deference you give to the stimulus)

      So the question ignores a bigger flaw: it’s possible there wasn’t even a link between Han purple and glass!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms