LR Question 22 Explanation, by LSATHacks
QUESTION TEXT: A study of 20,000 20- to 64-year-olds found that…
QUESTION TYPE: Most Strongly Supported
FACTS:
- Satisfaction with income mostly depends on how much you make relative to your neighbors.
ANALYSIS: The stimulus does not say that earning more money is irrelevant to happiness. Earning more money can definitely affect happiness, but only by comparison with what your neighbors make.
Lets assume that if you make the same as your neighbors, you feel neutral about your income.
So if you earn $50,000, and your neighbors earn $50,000, you’ll be very happy if you suddenly get $30,000 more per year.
Whereas if you earn $80,000, but your neighbors earn $200,000, you won’t be very happy even if you suddenly get $40,000 more per year.
An individual will feel happier if they get richer. But an entire country or neighborhood won’t feel happier if they all get richer. Happiness only depends on how rich we are compared to others.
___________
- This answer ignores neighborhoods. If high income people live with other high income people, then they won’t be more satisfied than middle income people.
- We have no idea. This would only be true if older people were more likely to have higher incomes than their neighbors.
- This is wrong. Neighborhoods often contain people with similar incomes. In that case, satisfaction would be about the same in all neighborhoods.
- This isn’t true. The stimulus actually says that more money will make you happier, if it means you earn more than your neighbors.
- CORRECT. Money only makes you happier if it makes you richer than your neighbors. So if everyone gets richer, then no one will be happier.
Free Logical Reasoning lesson
Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions
Hi, I'm Graeme Blake
I created LSATHacks, and scored a 177 on the LSAT.
Check out LSATHacks All Access
It's your one stop shop for LSAT prep: 1000s more explanations, and courses for both intro and advanced students. Lifetime access to everything on LSATHacks and anything I add. Plus a consult with me to get you started on the right track.
---------
Socials and Updates: If you have any questions, you can can check out my TikTok videos or email me.
For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.
I chose C and disqualified E on the idea that some people could get more money than others. So say you have 40k and your neighbor has 50k. You get a 30k increase in income while your neighbor gets a 10k. You both increased incomes, as E says, but now your income is 10k higher and you are more satisfied, as per the stimulus. I suppose the qualifier “greatly” and the vagueness of “people” in E might make it more possible, but idk
The key is that it is “an increase”, singular. Meaning, say, everyone gets $5000 more. What you describe is multiple increases.
You could quibble that maybe 5% of people saying that phrase would use a different meaning, edge cases, etc. But this is also a most strongly supported question, which just has to be ~80% supported.
Hi, would you be able to explain in more detail why C. is wrong? The study draws a correlation between satisfaction with income to neighbourhoods they live in. I understand that satisfaction is dependent on level of income relative to one’s neighbours, but I can’t understand how that’s different from “neighbourhoods they live in.” Thanks!