LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 142 › Logical Reasoning › Question 24

LSAT 142 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q24

LSAT Preptest 142 explanations

LR Question 24 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Any driver involved in an accident leading to personal…

QUESTION TYPE: Must be True

FACTS:

  1. (Injury OR $500) AND Capable ➞ Report
  2. Report ➞ Capable OR (Injury AND $500)
  3. Ted doesn’t have to report the accident.

ANALYSIS: This question uses a compound sufficient condition (Injury OR $500). I’ll explain how to think about it with an example. You’re trying to prove someone can buy a sandwich. You can buy a sandwich if you have: A $20 bill OR a bunch of coins OR a credit card OR a gift certificate.

It doesn’t make sense to write all of those out in a conditional statement though. Really, it should be: money ➞ can buy sandwich

That simplified statement comes from your common sense knowledge that all of the above equal money. If someone asks specifics, you know that “money” is more detailed that what you’ve written, but you don’t need to write everything in the statement.

In the case of this question, the simplified statement would be:

Bad thing AND Capable ➞ Report

The contrapositive is: Report ➞ Bad thing OR Capable

Basically, if you make a bad accident you have to report it – assuming you’re capable. The only catch is that “bad accident” has two components, either of which is enough to lead to a report.

“Unless” can be a tricky word to diagram. Use your common sense to think about what the word means. Making up examples to test the word is helpful.

For instance, go to work when you’re healthy unless there is a thunderstorm is: Healthy AND thunderstorm ➞ go to work

You negate whatever is after unless and make it a sufficient condition.

Since Ted doesn’t have to report the accident, we can say that either he’s not capable, or the accident wasn’t bad. Which in this case means both conditions for bad are out: no injury, and less than $500.

___________

  1. If Ted is incapable of reporting, then we have no condition that can force him to report. So we have no idea how bad the damage is.
  2. CORRECT. This is true. Normally, you have to report over $500 if you’re the driver. Ted doesn’t have to report, so he must not be capable. That’s the only exception to the rule.
  3. The stimulus only talks about the driver’s responsibility to report. Perhaps no other person ever has legal responsibility to report.
  4. There may be other reasons Ted is incapable of reporting. Perhaps he is far from any city, and he has no phone.
  5. This may not be true. It’s possible that someone was injured, but Ted is incapable of reporting. In that case, Ted doesn’t have to report.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 142
Next Question

More Resources for Must Be True Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements on the LSAT.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: This intro course lesson covers conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Must Be True questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers must be true questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms