LSATHacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • LSAT Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Mastery Courses
  • Login
  •   Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 77 › Logical Reasoning 1 › Question 25

LSAT 77, Logical Reasoning I, Q25, LSATHacks

LSAT 77 Explanations

LR Question 25 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: Among small- to medium-sized marine mammals…

QUESTION TYPE: Must Be False

FACTS:

  1. Longer = deeper
  2. D > NFS
  3. ES > WS

ANALYSIS: Unusually, this question is like a logic game. Specifically, a sequencing game. We know the relative ordering of dolphins vs. northern fur seals, and elephant seals vs. Weddell seals.

You may have wondered: does longer really mean deeper? If you skim the answers, it’s clear this has to be the case. Otherwise, the question wouldn’t make sense. Don’t get hung up in technicalities when it’s clear there’s only one plausible interpretation of a given statement.

In another circumstance, I could see such a statement not being definitive, and there being other factors. E.g. “The healthier your food, the longer you live” clearly shouldn’t mean that food is the only factor. But if you consider the full circumstances of this question and the answers, the question is only possible if longer = deeper, so it’s silly to fret about whether that isn’t the case.

Once you equate the two terms, this question is easy. Just go through the answers and see which one violates one of the ordering facts. I drew the diagrams below for each answer and checked them against the diagrams from the stimulus. A, B, C and E are consistent with the stimulus. D contradicts it. I wouldn’t say this question is hard. It’s just unfamiliar. The logic is actually extremely easy.

___________

  1. ES > DS > WS,
  2. D > WS > NF
  3. WS > D > NFS
  4. CORRECT. WS > D > NFS > ES. This diagram contradicts the diagrams from the stimulus. WS can’t be before ES.
  5. ES > NFS > WS

Previous Question
PT 77 /  PT 145

Quick Jump PT Section Que

Free Five Part LSAT Email Course

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. alex says

    June 30, 2020 at 12:39 pm

    Hi, I’m still struggling to see how a conclusion about dolphins relative to Weddell seals can be made. How is it that you can conclude Elephant seals can hold their breath longer than dolphins when the stimulus only compares Dolphins to northern fur seals?

    It seems to me that the stimulus presents two sets of comparisons that don’t allow you to conclude anything between the sets. Can you help me see how you can make a claim about one point in a set and a point from the other set?

    Thanks!

    Reply
    • Tutor Rosalie (LSATHacks) says

      September 16, 2020 at 10:26 am

      The stimulus doesn’t give enough info to compare the two sets on their own, but the answers add new information that we can combine with the information from the stimulus. This is how we can make the deduction. It’s easier to think of the two comparison metrics as the same (submerged longer = greater depths). The stimulus gives these two comparisons:
      Dolphins > Northern
      Elephant > Weddell

      Like you said, because the stimulus doesn’t give an idea of how the two comparisons are related to one another, you can’t tell the exact order of which animal can stay submerged longer/dive to greater depths. If it helps, you can think of this question like a sequence logic game where you have four objects that you need to rank. We can diagram it like this:
      D…N
      E…W
      Where the animal to the left is able to be submerged longer/dive to greater depths.

      Answer choice D gives the following constraints:
      Northern > Elephant
      Weddell > Dolphins

      Is this possible? No! If we combine the constraint N > E with the stimulus D > N, we get this sequence:
      D – N – E

      So far this is fine, but then the stimulus also gives us E > W. But Answer Choice D’s second constraint, W > D, presents a complication and contradicts the E > W from the stimulus. W can’t possibly submerge longer/dive deeper than D if it’s also supposed to submerge shorter/dive shallower than E. Thus, Answer Choice D is wrong.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Ultimate Bundle

Get the LSATHacks Mastery seminars, the Intro Course, the LSATHacks Mastery Toolkit and a Strategy Call. All for only $499, satisfaction guaranteed.

Buy now

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial
  • FAQ/Legal

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2025 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal