LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 147 › Logical Reasoning › Question 18

LSAT 147 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q18

LSAT Preptest 147 explanations

LR Question 18 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: A large survey of scientists found that almost all…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: Most of the scientists think the Minsk Hypothesis is wrong.

REASONING: Almost all of the scientists think Wang’s Law is true, and also all of them know the results of the Brown-Eisler experiment. Wang + Brown-Eisler show that Minsk hypothesis is wrong.

ANALYSIS: This argument mixes up two things. There’s knowing something, and there’s knowing what your belief implies.

For instance, someone may know that wearing unfashionable clothing makes them look silly. And, that same person may know that they are wearing sandals and socks.

But, that person may not be aware that wearing sandals and socks is generally considered unfashionable. So, even though they know two relevant facts which can be combined together, this unfashionable person may not realize that this is the case. Likewise, the scientists may not realize that their combined beliefs mean that the Minsk hypothesis is wrong.

___________

  1. CORRECT. If this isn’t true, then why would the scientists reject the Minsk hypothesis?
    Negation: The scientists didn’t realize that Wang + Brown-Eisler means the Minsk hypothesis is wrong.
  2. “Almost all” is a large number, perhaps 95%. So, this answer is saying “95% of scientists accept Wang’s law, and those exact same 95% know the result of Brown Eisler”
     
    That doesn’t matter. The conclusion only said that “most” scientists reject the Minsk hypothesis. If you combine two groups of 95%, you are going to have large overlap of beliefs. Imagine if 95% of your friends liked the Simpsons and 95% liked Seinfeld. You’d expect most of your friends would like both, right?
     
    It’s very rare a question would require an exact overlap between two “almost all” groups.
  3. It doesn’t matter how the results were obtained. It only matters whether the scientists know about them.
  4. This doesn’t matter. The conclusion was only about what the scientists in the survey believed. It’s not about the whole field.
  5. This seems relevant, but it isn’t. The survey is about what scientists believe. Their beliefs may not necessarily be accurate.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 147
Next Question
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms