LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 147 › Logical Reasoning › Question 22

LSAT 147 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q22

LSAT Preptest 147 explanations

LR Question 22 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: After a hepadnavirus inserts itself into a chromosome…

QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen

CONCLUSION: The hepadnavirus is at least 25 million years old.

REASONING: When an animal’s chromosome has a hepadnavirus inserted into it, bits of that virus are passed on to the animals descendants. Both zebra finches and dark-eyed juncos have a hepadnovirus in the same location. These bird species split around 25 million years ago.

ANALYSIS: This argument makes an assumption: the hepadnovirus won’t go to the same place in different species. If every hepadnovirus infection of a new species always goes to the same spot in the chromosome, then we have no evidence. The two species could have gotten the virus at different times.

The divergence is only significant on the assumption that the species had the virus before the divergence. To prove that, we have to show that the virus would normally go in a random spot. (And so the fact that both species have it in the same spot proves that their precursor species had it, in that same spot.)

___________

  1. This suggests that the hepadnavirus caused the diverging. But the word “can” is very weak. We have to take answers at their least useful, so this could mean that there is 0.0001% chance that’s what actually occurred.
  2. Who cares? Maybe most animals have dozens of viruses in their chromosomes. We’re only talking about one specific virus.
  3. CORRECT. If this is true, then the two species could only have the virus in the same location because their ancestor had it. It would be too much chance for the insertion to have randomly occurred in the same spot in two distinct species.
  4. So? The author never said only those species have the virus. The author mentioned them because their divergence 25 million years ago may tell us something about the hepadnavirus’ age.
  5. This doesn’t matter. The two species obviously did survive, whether or not the virus helped. We only care what these two species’ divergence can tell us about the hepadnavirus’ age.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 147
Next Question

More Resources for Strengthen Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Strengthen questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers strengthen questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Alex says

    July 6, 2020 at 11:18 pm

    This is a strengthen question. Your answer just seems to blow off “A” too easily. If the virus can thereby influence the divergence of the species, you could argue that this answer makes room for the possibility of it existing 25 million years ago (it could have been the virus that caused them to diverge).

    I can see why C is a strengthener too, but perhaps the case is worth making as to why its STRONGER than A.

    Thanks.

    Reply
    • Graeme Blake says Founder

      April 17, 2024 at 8:28 pm

      I think you’re right that I should reword A, but fundamentally it is a very weak answer. “Can” is an incredibly weak word, it might mean this happens 0.0000000001% of the time. You have to interpret Strengthen answers at their least useful.

      Note: This is an old comment but I wanted to address the point.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms