LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 147 › Logical Reasoning › Question 6

LSAT 147 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q6

LSAT Preptest 147 explanations

LR Question 6 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Scientist: Laboratory animals have access to ample…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: The fact that lab animals get lots of food and little exercise can skew the results of scientific research on those animals.

REASONING: These studies assume that the animals are healthy.

ANALYSIS: This is one of those questions where you may already be assuming the correct answer without realizing it. If an argument seems obvious, ask yourself if you’re adding any additional assumptions without noticing. In this case, the assumption is that if an animal eats too much and doesn’t exercise, that animal will be unhealthy.

___________

  1. This is actually an insane statement. Taken literally, it means that “restricted diet + plenty of exercise ➞ healthy”.
    With no exceptions. So, if an animals gets….Cancer? No matter, the animal will be healthy if it gets exercise. Fatal stab wound? The animal will live, if given a restricted diet and exercise! You have to think literally on the LSAT.
    Negation: 99.9% of lab animals are healthy when given a restricted diet and plenty of exercise. 0.01% are unhealthy due to preexisting disease and other factors.
  2. CORRECT. The argument hinged on that fact that studies assume animals are healthy. If this answer isn’t true, then that assumption is valid and the argument falls apart.
    Negation: There’s nothing unhealthy about giving animals ample food and little exercise.
  3. So? This answer could be referring to pets. The question is whether such animals are unhealthy.
  4. “Some” could refer to two studies out of 100,000. This answer isn’t significant. Negating it could mean moving from 2 to 0, which hardly makes a difference: either way most studies don’t consider living conditions.
  5. Why would we care about variation? It doesn’t tell us whether an animal is health or not. If an animal eats 20% too much per day, without variation, they will become fat. If they eat 40% too little, without variation, they will starve. Lack of variation by itself tells us nothing.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 147
Next Question
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms