• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

LSAT Hacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • Start Here
    • About
  • LSAT Explanations
  • LSATHacks Pro
  • Tutoring
    • Tutoring
    • Mastery seminars
    • Course
    • Books
  • Blog
  • Login
LSAT Explanations » LSAT Preptest 79 » Reading Comprehension » Passage 3 Analysis

LSAT 79, RC Passage 3, Woodland Clearings, LSATHacks

LSAT 79 Explanations

RC Passage 3 Explanation, by LSATHacks

Paragraph Summaries

  1. Woodland clearings were used in Mesolithic Europe roughly 7000-12000 years ago. The consensus is that these were used for hunting. But, we have only circumstantial evidence for that idea. In particular, we have no hard evidence that humans prepared animal food in or near these clearings.
  2. Our actual evidence for wood clearing use comes from ethnography: some recent premodern human populations burned down parts of forests to make larger grazing areas. But, other ethnographic evidence supports a non-economic origin to clearings.
  3. Yi-Fu Tuan rightly argues that past humans were afraid of wilderness, including in preliterate and nonurban societies. 
  4. Recently, we learned that Mesolithic peoples moved around forests using established paths. The author proposes that this was due to fear of the forest. It could have been fear of wildlife, of spirits, or of getting lost.
  5. The author’s alternate theory of forest clearings:
    1. Long terms paths form due to fear
    2. People start concentrating activities near the paths.
    This means we should consider that wilderness was a motivation, and that some clearings were formed merely where paths crossed and the concentration of activity moved the forest back.

Analysis

This argument is heavy on speculation. And it’s fairly complex. If you have trouble understanding it, you should read the paragraph summaries above and make sure you understand the information presented.

The standard view is that woodland clearings were made by humans in order to hunt. If animals grazed in clearings, then they would be easy to see and to hunt.

But, we lack direct evidence for this standard view. So, the author launches into their speculative theory that clearings were formed where woodland paths met. Humans kept paths and clearings clear because we feared the forest.

Both theories rely entirely on circumstantial evidence, which mainly comes in the form of ethnography. That is to say, the study of recent human populations. 

E.g. ethnography probably started 200 years ago. So, if someone writing in 1843 described the traditions of a premodern population, that would be ethnographic evidence. Studies of modern hunter gatherers would also be ethnographic. In general, ethnography involves the study of a population that exists at the time the researcher studies it.

Historical ethnography is therefore by definition largely impossible. Much as it would be nice to study how people lived in 782 AD, we don’t have time machines. So, our ethnographic data generally only starts from the time people actively started studying cultures.

This means we will never have direct ethnographic evidence about what Mesolithic humans did.

Previous Question
Table Of Contents
Next Question




Want a free Reading Comp lesson?

Get a free sample of the Reading Comprehension Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving RC questions

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I created LSATHacks, and scored a 177 on the LSAT.

Book a free consult with me to discuss how you can improve your score: Book a consult

---------
Socials and Updates: If you have any questions, you can can check out my TikTok videos or email me.

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


New! LSATHacks Pro: Get every course on LSATHacks for $59.99/month

LSATHacks Pro

Get a higher score with LSATHacks Pro

LSAT Course, LSAT Mastery seminars, and 3,000 extra explanations. All for $59.99/month, satisfaction guaranteed, no minimum commitment. Sign up here: https://lsathacks.com/lsathacks-pro/

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

© Copyright 2023 LSAT Hacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal

Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.
×
Item Added to your Cart!
There are no products
Continue Shopping