LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 148 › Logical Reasoning › Question 18

LSAT 148 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q18

LSAT Preptest 148 explanations

LR Question 18 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Liang: Watching movies in which violence is portrayed…

QUESTION TYPE: Agreement

ARGUMENTS: Liang says that watching violent movies increases aggression, and therefore we shouldn’t let children watch them.

Sarah says that watching violent movies causes the audience to experience the emotions associated with aggression, and therefore get rid of those emotions. So, we should allow mature audiences to watch violent movies.

ANALYSIS: Liang and Sarah don’t agree on much. I couldn’t prephrase this question. Mostly, they’re talking at cross purposes: Liang doesn’t address Sarah’s argument and Sarah doesn’t address what Liang says.

___________

  1. Only Sarah mentions this. Liang has no opinion.
  2. Only Liang mentioned violence being an appropriate way to solve problems (i.e. being portrayed as such in movies). Sarah didn’t mention this concept.
  3. Neither person said movies cause violence. Liang said they increase levels of aggression (which could mean, say, shouting or aggressive language) and Sarah says such movies make us feel particular emotions.
  4. CORRECT. This answer is wonderfully vague, and therefore both people can agree with it. Liang thinks we understand how violent movies affect aggression. Sarah thinks watching violent drama causes people to feel the emotions associated with aggression. In this, they both agree that we understand something about the effects.

    Vague statements are always easy to agree with. Compare these two ideas:

    • American is the greatest country in the world or America is a terrible country, vs.
    • America has some good or some bad features

    Either version of the former phrase can be quite controversial. Almost 100% of people could agree with the second statement.

  5. Neither person says who is attracted to such dramas.

Recap: The question begins with “Liang: Watching movies in which violence is”. It is a Agreement question. To practice more Agreement questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 148
Next Question

More Resources for Point at Issue Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Point at Issue questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers point at issue questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms