QUESTION TEXT: Patterson: Bone flutes dating to the Upper…
QUESTION TYPE: Method of Reasoning
ARGUMENTS: Patterson thinks it’s likely that music began in the Upper Paleolithic because bone flutes from that era are our earliest evidence for music.
Garza points out that many materials used for instruments are perishable and wouldn’t be found in archaeological sites. Bones are an exception in being likely to survive.
ANALYSIS: Garza raises the problem of survivorship bias. The bone instruments didn’t survive because they were the earliest, but rather because they were made of bone.
So, this means that Patterson’s data isn’t good enough to determine the earliest existence of music. We’d have to somehow figure out whether perishable instruments existed earlier.
Frankly, I found this a very hard question. I saw the flaw, but I didn’t know how to describe it in terms of the answers.
___________
- CORRECT. Body of evidence = surviving instruments.
This is insufficient for figuring out when music was invented, because early instruments made of materials such as wood did not survive, even if they were made before the bone flutes. - This didn’t happen.
Example of challenging premise: Actually, some bone flutes were found 6000 years before the ones you’re referring to. This was in a period earlier than the upper Paleolithic. - A counterexample to the conclusion would involve somehow disproving it with an example.
Example of counterexample: Actually, I have found ancient cave paintings which show music being performed long before these bone flutes were made. So music arose earlier. - An analogous argument is pretty recognizable. There wasn’t one here.
Example of analogy: Animal bones dating to the Upper Paleolithic are the earliest examples of human food found. Therefore, humans likely first started eating in the Upper Paleolithic. - Garza isn’t just using Patterson’s evidence: they introduced new evidence of their own about material durability.
I found this a very tempting answer, because I missed that point. “Using Patterson’s evidence” would mean introducing literally no new information. So Garza did more than use Patterson’s evidence.
Recap: The question begins with “Patterson: Bone flutes dating to the Upper”. It is a Method of Reasoning question. To practice more Method of Reasoning questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.
Free Logical Reasoning lesson
Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions
Leave a Reply