LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 148 › Logical Reasoning › Question 3

LSAT 148 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q3

LSAT Preptest 148 explanations

LR Question 3 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Whether or not one can rightfully call a person’s…

QUESTION TYPE: Identify the Conclusion

CONCLUSION: Whether a person’s faithfulness is is a virtue depends partly on the object that faithfulness is directed towards.

REASONING: Virtues must be praiseworthy. Resentment is faithfulness to a hatred, but no one considers resentment praiseworthy, and therefore it isn’t a virtue.

ANALYSIS: The first sentence says “depends in part on”. This kind of claim is usually a conclusion: it is mentioning a cause, and not claiming it as a total cause. Premises will typically be more absolute, like “virtues are by definition praiseworthy”.

Also note that is says “rightfully”, which is a moral claim. Those tend to show up only in conclusions. (I mean moral in the sense of “this is right” or “this is wrong” as opposed to factual claims like “this is blue” or “people consider this praiseworthy”)

You can also see that the second sentence supports the first. The virtue of faithfulness depends on the object because some objects are not praiseworthy.

___________

  1. CORRECT. Yes. This is the first sentence, which is supported by the second. See the analysis above for more detail.
  2. This was a premise, supporting the claim the faithfulness wouldn’t be virtuous in all cases.
  3. The argument actually didn’t say this. It said “no one considers resentment virtuous”. But, that’s different from saying we can’t call behavior motivated by hatred to be virtuous.
     
    For example, someone might do a good deed because they wanted to upstage a rival. Some might still call it virtuous, especially if they didn’t know why the good deed was done.
  4. The argument didn’t say this.
  5. The argument didn’t say this. It merely said people don’t consider resentment virtuous.

Recap: The question begins with “Whether or not one can rightfully call”. It is a Identify the Conclusion question. To practice more Identify the Conclusion questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 148
Next Question

More Resources for Identify the Conclusion Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Identify the Conclusion questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers identify the conclusion questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms