LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 148 › Logical Reasoning › Question 14

LSAT 148 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q14

LSAT Preptest 148 explanations

LR Question 14 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Principle: A government should reduce taxes on imports…

QUESTION TYPE: Principle

CONCLUSION: The government shouldn’t lower taxes on imported textiles.

REASONING:

  • Financial benefit to many consumers ➞ lower taxes on imports
  • Exception: Domestic industry significantly harmed ➞ don’t lower taxes on imports

ANALYSIS: This is an interesting logical structure. Usually, LSAT reasoning doesn’t deal in exceptions. But here, we have a conditional statement, which is normally true 100% of the time. But, the author tells us there is one exception.

Since the conclusion is “don’t lower taxes” that must mean the exception applies. So, the answer should say “Some domestic industry would be significantly harmed if textile import taxes were lowered”.

Consumer benefit is irrelevant, and can be skipped when reading answers. The point of an exception is that you ignore the general rule.

___________

  1. Benefit to consumers was a sufficient condition for lower textile taxes. It’s not necessary: there could be another reason we should lower taxes, even if consumers don’t benefit.
  2. Benefit to an existing industry doesn’t matter. We only need to make sure that none are significantly harmed. Lack of benefit doesn’t mean harm.
  3. This competition is in the export markets. I.e. in other countries. Changing import tariffs has no effect on export markets – imports only refer to goods coming into the domestic economy.
  4. So? It doesn’t matter if other measures are better. There is a benefit to tariff reductions in this case, and so there’s no obvious reason not to lower taxes. Only significant harm would be a reason to keep tariffs up.
  5. CORRECT. This exactly matches the one exception to the rule. Since there is significant harm to a domestic industry, we shouldn’t lower import tariffs.

Recap: The question begins with “Principle: A government should reduce taxes on”. It is a Principle question. To practice more Principle questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 148
Next Question

More Resources for Principle Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Principle questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers principle questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms