LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 148 › Logical Reasoning › Question 21

LSAT 148 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q21

LSAT Preptest 148 explanations

LR Question 21 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Critic: To be a literary classic a book must reveal…

QUESTION TYPE: Must be True

FACTS:

  1. Literary classic ➞ reveal something about human condition
  2. Not worthy of serious study ➞ reveal something about human condition

ANALYSIS: This is a classic conditional chain. The argument has given us two conditional statements. If you take the contrapositive of the first statement, you can chain them together, like this:

  1. Not worthy of serious study ➞ reveal something about human condition ➞ Literary classic

So, we can conclude that if something isn’t worthy of serious study, then it is not a literary classic. You can also take the contrapositive of the whole chain. That’s what the right answer does: literary classic ➞ reveal something about the human condition ➞ worthy of serious study.

___________

  1. This is the incorrect negation of the deduction from the analysis above.
  2. CORRECT. See the analysis above. If we join both statements together, we get a longer chain which has this as a conclusion.
  3. This is actually a quantity statement. It’s saying “literary classics worthy of serious study do not exist”. Whereas a conditional statement would say they cannot exist. The stimulus only had conditional statements. Further, this answer contrasts with this statement we deduced in the stimulus: “If there are literary classics, then they’re worthy of serious study”
  4. In the stimulus we showed “classic ➞ reveal ➞ worthy study”. This answer is very similar to an incorrect reversal of the final statement. Suppose I say “all cats have tails”. Is it possible that there are things with tails that aren’t cats? Yes. But can we prove it just using the “C ➞ T” statement? No. That’s what’s wrong with this answer.
  5. This is exactly the same answer as D. If you view the chain as A ➞ B ➞ C, then D said “Some C not B”, and E says “Some B are not A”. See answer D for the full explanation, but if you have A ➞ B, then you can’t prove “some B are not A”.

Recap: The question begins with “Critic: To be a literary classic a”. It is a Must be True question. To practice more Must be True questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 148
Next Question

More Resources for Must Be True Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements on the LSAT.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: This intro course lesson covers conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Must Be True questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers must be true questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms