DISCUSSION: The two authors completely disagree about insider trading: passage A is for it, passage B is against it.
This question is asking for something they agree about. Whatever it is, it surely isn’t insider trading.
___________
- The author of passage A doesn’t mention this. But, since they’re for insider trading, they likely disagree. The author of passage B agrees with this answer.
- The author of passage B agrees. The author of passage A thinks it’s more important that information flows as quickly as possible. This can only happen if insiders are allowed to trade as soon as they know something. See lines 16-30 for the emphasis on speed.
- CORRECT. Both agree on this. In fact, who would disagree with this? I’m sure even Karl Marx would have thought “If someone is a stock investor in a capitalist society, then it’s fine to try to gain an advantage by shrewd analysis.”
- I think both authors disagree with this answer. The author of passage A specifically says insider nontrading shouldn’t be regulated (lines 35-36). The author of passage B doesn’t mention insider nontrading. But, since it would be very hard to enforce (“buy that stock or we’ll throw you in jail!”), I doubt this author would be for it either.
We’re looking for an answer both authors agree with. This answer would be one that, at best, they both disagree with. - The author of passage A agrees with this. The author of passage B hates insider trading. They would instead think that the information should be disseminated in some public way that lets everyone access it at the same time.
Leave a Reply