LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 148 › Reading Comprehension › Question 6

LSAT 148 | Section 2 | Reading Comprehension: Q6

LSAT Preptest 148 explanations

RC Question 6 Explanation

DISCUSSION: Lines 49-51 say that:

  • Everybody in our world would agree that
  • Every person in the new world should have
  • A minimum quantity of each primary good

The primary goods are: rights, liberties, powers, opportunities, income and wealth.

The reasoning was:

  1. We don’t know who we will be in the new world
  2. Every person wants a minimum quantity of these primary goods for themselves
  3. Therefore, when designing a new world we would surely want each hypothetical person to have that minimum, so that we have no risk of missing them.

To prephrase this, you can try to think which of the steps in the reasoning above you yourself might disagree with, when crafting an ideal world. But honestly, it’s probably easier just to think about the answers and think “ah yes, that’s a reasonable point” when you see the right one. I hadn’t prephrased this.

___________

  1. Rawls’ theory is aware of this, and deals with it. Since you are behind the “veil of ignorance”, you won’t know your position in the new society. Therefore, your interest is in making sure that everyone has a decent life. That way you have no risk of having a bad one.
  2. Rawls was proposing a thought experiment. He didn’t think his idea was possible in practice, so this answer is no objection.
  3. CORRECT. If this is true, then people might prefer a world where some participants have no power, but massive athletic ability, or massive income, for example. You might be happy as a super rich athlete with no political power, for example. This would counter Rawls’ argument that his idea would produce a world where everyone had a minimum of all types of primary goods.
  4. The author didn’t say that people will get only a minimum of primary goods. They said they will get at least a minimum of primary goods. So people might have far more than the minimum. 
  5. I’m not sure this matters. People creating the new society will be distributing everything up front. An overestimate is something that happens before you start distributing. Once you are distributing, I’m not sure overestimation is even possible. Likewise, you won’t know your own needs, because when you are behind “the veil of ignorance” you won’t know your position in the new society.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 148
Next Passage
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms