LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 146 › Logical Reasoning › Question 10

LSAT 146 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q10

LSAT Preptest 146 explanations

LR Question 10 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: One who has borrowed an item from someone and…

QUESTION TYPE: Principle – Justify

PRINCIPLE: Not too hard to return on time AND no permission to return late AND promise to return by a certain date ➞ should return on time

ANALYSIS: This is a fairly straightforward principle. If the three sufficient conditions above are true, you should return on time. That’s it, that’s all we can conclude.

What if we’re missing one of the three conditions? Well, then we can’t prove anything, because the sufficient condition is actually all three of them, together – they’re joined by “and” statements.

So, the real difficulty here is finding an answer that matches. There are three wrong answers each missing one of the sufficient conditions. You have to find the one that has all three.

___________

  1. The principle is about whether or not we should return something on time, or late. It has nothing to say about returning an item early: presumably that is ok in most cases.
  2. This is close, it has two of the three sufficient conditions. But, one of the sufficient conditions was “if it would not be difficult”, and this answer says it would be difficult.
  3. This has two of the three sufficient conditions. But one of the conditions was “the person did not give permission for a late return”, and this answer says there is permission for a late return.
  4. Like B and C, this has two of the three sufficient conditions. But, it is missing the third: there had to be a promise to return by tomorrow. Since there was no such promise here, we have no basis for concluding Yesenia should return the computer tomorrow.
  5. CORRECT. Here we have all three sufficient conditions: Oliver promised to bring back the guitar, it would be easy, and he doesn’t have permission for a late return. So, according to the principle he should return it. Note that “easy to return” is the same thing as the “not difficult to return” used in the stimulus. Sometimes LSAC will use different language that has the same meaning.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 146
Next Question

More Resources for Principle Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Principle questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers principle questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms