LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 146 › Logical Reasoning › Question 13

LSAT 146 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q13

LSAT Preptest 146 explanations

LR Question 13 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: A six-month public health campaign sought to limit…

QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen

CONCLUSION: The public followed the health campaign’s advice.

REASONING: A public health campaign told people to wash their hands and avoid public places if they had flu symptoms. And, influenza rates were much lower than expected during the months of the campaign.

ANALYSIS: So far, the argument has shown a correlation between the public health campaign and lower influenza rates. We can strengthen the argument by giving some more direct evidence that people followed the campaign’s advice, or by ruling out an alternate explanation.

Note that to strengthen the argument, the campaign must be the cause of the change. Some wrong answers specifically said that people washed their hands or stayed home for reasons unrelated to the public health campaign. That doesn’t count.

(It’s true that the right answer doesn’t say the campaign caused hand washing, but the difference is that it didn’t specifically say an alternate cause was the real reason.)

___________

  1. CORRECT. This indirectly strengthens the argument by suggesting people were in fact washing their hands more than normal. We don’t know for sure the campaign is what caused it, but this is definitely strengthening evidence.
  2. This weakens the argument. If people had followed the campaign’s advice, they would have stayed home when they had symptoms, lowering the spread of disease. This would have affected both influenza and the common cold, since those diseases share symptoms. Since the rate of colds didn’t go down, presumably people weren’t staying at home. Some other factor may have reduced influenza.
  3. This weakens the argument: it gives an alternate cause for the decline in influenza. If public gatherings decline, people will stay at home and not spread their influenza. And this has nothing to do with the health advice.
  4. This weakens the argument by giving an alternate cause. It wasn’t the public health campaign that caused hand washing: it was the news media.
  5. Good intentions don’t count for much. People may say they should avoid spreading germs, but still head in to work when they feel ill. Consider how many people say they should follow smoking health campaigns, yet continue to smoke. Actions and intentions are different things.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 146
Next Question

More Resources for Strengthen Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Strengthen questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers strengthen questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Zach Islam says

    September 11, 2020 at 4:30 pm

    I don’t understand… wouldn’t C directly strengthent the conclusion that the public followed the campaign’s advice when the campaign itself told them to stay home?

    Reply
    • Rosalie (LSATHacks) says Tutor

      September 18, 2020 at 9:59 am

      The public health campaign never said to have fewer large public gatherings. It only said to stay home if you’re having symptoms of influenza. Thus, the decline in large public gatherings was caused by something else, which makes this a possible alternative cause of the lowered rates of influenza. This would actually weaken the the argument. Also it seems like you’ve attributed current coronavirus health guidelines to this question. You always need to guard against attributing outside/real-world information to questions, and stay within the scope of the stimulus.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms