DISCUSSION: Passage A and Passage B seem complementary. Passage A explains why research may work in trials. Passage B explains why it wouldn’t work in appeals courts, using similar reasons that passage A does.
___________
- Passage A was positive, but both of these are negative.
- CORRECT. This matches. “Beneficial for some people” = trial court judges. “People with high blood pressure” = appellate court judges.
This matches the structure in saying “some people should do a thing, but another category of people absolutely should not” - Passage B was very clear that appellate court judges should not do research. The second half of this doesn’t match at all: “inconclusive” research describes a situation where we can’t draw a definite conclusion.
- This doesn’t match: passages A and B were talking about different things: trial court judges vs. appellate court judges. Here, both titles discuss the same thing: salt substitutes.
- Passage A was positive. Whereas the first title here is neutral: “health effects of salt” could be good or bad.
Want a free Reading Comp lesson?
Get a free sample of the Reading Comprehension Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving RC questions
Leave a Reply