DISCUSSION: This question stem is quite clear. The passage literally answers one of the questions. You should practice quickly locating information in the passage: it can let you get questions like this with 100% certainty.
I don’t memorize facts when I read a passage, but I do take note of them. It helps when doing a question like this: you can quickly dismiss some answers as likely wrong, and you can also locate information more quickly if you remember roughly where it was.
___________
- The Brazilian Amazon is only mentioned in lines 16-17, and the author doesn’t say what percent of the forest is there. The only “percent of forest” mention in the passage is the fact that commercial forests are 3% of tropical rain forests.
- This is a trap answer. It’s true that lines 48-49 say plantations are designed to produce wood and wood pulp. But this answer says how many products are derived from plantations. Derived means “comes from”, no matter how long the chain is. So if paper comes from wood pulp made on a plantation, then paper is “derived” from the plantation.
There are countless products made from wood pulp and we have no idea what their total is. - CORRECT. Line 22 in the middle of paragraph 2 says that trees produce oxygen by photosynthesis.
- This isn’t in the passage, and it’s unlikely it would be. The author’s point is that, on balance, forests don’t produce oxygen (because trees consume oxygen when they die). So this answer doesn’t make sense in light of the author’s argument.
- We don’t know. Carbon dioxide is only mentioned once, in lines 18-19. The author spends more time talking about oxygen. (Though they don’t make this comparison for oxygen, either)
Want a free Reading Comp lesson?
Get a free sample of the Reading Comprehension Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving RC questions
Nernemsaa Golding says
I got this question right but not without some serious consideration. My confusion came mainly from answer choice B. Ive looked in various places and no one is talking about how the second sentence of the passage literally mentions “5,000 commercial products produced from forests”. Can you explain to me how this doesn’t help B’s case??
FounderGraeme Blake says
I can help there :) So, the LSAT is all about key conceptual distinctions. You flagged an important sentence, but it refers to products derived from forests, e.g. natural forests.
Whereas B talks about commercial plantations. Groups of trees or plants managed by humans which aren’t forests. B is a definite trap and probably was written to target the exact sentence you highlighted. Thanks for asking, it’s a great question. Hope this helps!