LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 149 › Logical Reasoning › Question 22

LSAT 149 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q22

LSAT Preptest 149 explanations

LR Question 22 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: The temperature in Taychester is always at least 10 degrees…

QUESTION TYPE: Paradox

PARADOX: Taychester is colder than Charlesville, but Charlesville residents spend more on heating in the winter.

ANALYSIS: To resolve this paradox, we need to establish some difference between Taychester and Charlesville that explains the discrepancy in heating costs. A proper resolution will give a reason for Charlesville costs to be higher, or a reason for Taychester costs to be lower.

Note that this is an except question – so 4 of the answers will resolve the paradox. The correct answer will not.

___________

  1. This resolves the paradox. Greater heat loss in Charlesville would require more heating expenses.
  2. CORRECT. This answers really tries to make you think that Charlesville nights are colder than Taychester nights. But look at the stimulus again! It says Taychester is always colder than Charlesville: no exception.
     
    So cold Charlesville nights mean even colder Taychester nights, which won’t resolve the paradox.
  3. This resolves the paradox. Higher heating costs in Charlesville would naturally mean residents pay more for heating. Even if they use less energy the energy itself costs more.
  4. This resolves the paradox. Charlesville is generally warmer than Taychester. So according to this principle people in Charlesville like warm temperatures and keep their homes warmer in winter. This leads to more expenses.
  5. This resolves the paradox. Taychester is colder, so the houses there would be better insulated. This means they retain their heat, so costs are less than in the warmer Charlesville.

Recap: The question begins with “The temperature in Taychester is always at least 10 degrees”. It is a Paradox question. Learn more about LSAT Paradox questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 149
Next Question

More Resources for Paradox Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Paradox questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers paradox questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms