LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 150 › Logical Reasoning › Question 24

LSAT 150 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q24

LSAT Preptest 150 explanations

LR Question 24 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Legal theorist: Only two types of theories of criminal sentencing…

QUESTION TYPE: Must be True

FACTS:

  1. There are 2 acceptable types of theories of criminal sentencing: retributivist (sentence only for punishment) and rehabilitationist (sentences can reform).
  2. Retributivist theories are only acceptable if punishment is proportional to offense.
  3. Retributivist theories can’t give harsher punishments for repeat offenses – they aren’t proportional. If they do, they are unacceptable.

ANALYSIS: There’s a lot to work with here, so it is best to look at the answers instead of trying to prephrase in this case. Make sure to keep the categories straight in your head. We know a lot more about retributivist theories than rehabilitationist theories, but that doesn’t mean we can make hasty assumptions about rehabilitationist theories.

It’s important to note that the “punishment must be proportional” principle only explicitly applies to the first category (retributivist) and not the second (rehabilitationist).

___________

  1. This is incorrect. We don’t know that no rehabilitationist theory holds this – it’s certainly possible that some believe punishment can reform.
  2. We don’t know this for sure. We know that retributivist theories don’t allow longer sentences for repeat offenses, but we don’t know for sure that it sometimes helps to reform.
  3. This is too hasty. We don’t know what makes rehabilitationist theories acceptable or unacceptable, so we can’t say that all of any kind of theories are acceptable.
  4. This cannot be inferred. We know that proportionality is necessary for retributivist theories to be acceptable. But this doesn’t mean all theories that follow this principle are acceptable. Maybe there’s a second condition that is also required.
  5. CORRECT. We know that longer sentences for repeat offenses makes a retributivist theory unacceptable. We also know that there are only two types of theories. So if such a theory is acceptable, it must be a rehabilitationist theory.
     
    Note that this isn’t saying that it’s certainly acceptable as long as it’s rehabilitationist. It’s just saying that it must be rehabilitationist.

Recap: The question begins with “Legal theorist: Only two types of theories of criminal sentencing”. It is a Must be True question. Learn more about LSAT MBT questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 150
Next Question

More Resources for Must Be True Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements on the LSAT.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: This intro course lesson covers conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Must Be True questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers must be true questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms