LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 154 › Logical Reasoning › Question 24

LSAT 154 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q24

LSAT Preptest 154 explanations

LR Question 24 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Until recently, experts have been unable to identify the…

QUESTION TYPE: Weaken

CONCLUSION: The artist who painted the self-portrait also painted the battle scene

REASONING: The self-portrait was dated to the same year the battle scene was painted, and resembles a figure in the battle scene.

ANALYSIS: This argument seems a bit thin. It could just be a coincidence that the figure in the battle scene resembles the self portrait. Or, since the artists in the self-portrait is well-known, someone else could’ve painted him into the battle scene. Other possibilities include that it’s narcissistic for an artist to put himself into a painting with other aristocrats.

___________

  1. This doesn’t seem to strengthen nor weaken the argument.
  2. Okay and so what? How does this weaken that the artist painted the battle scene? Also, this is talking about “most” of the figures in the painting so there is some wriggle room for the artist to paint himself into the painting.
  3. A battle scene would have many participants. Using live models doesn’t mean you use a live model for every person in the painting. The artist could easily have used live models and also included themselves.
  4. CORRECT. If it violated etiquette, then the artist wouldn’t have painted himself into a historical battle.
  5. This doesn’t weaken the argument. So what if the battle took place before the artist was born? The artist still knew about the battle, and it doesn’t stop him from painting himself in.

Recap: The question begins with “Until recently, experts have been unable to identify the”. It is a Weaken question. Learn more about LSAT Weaken questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 154
Next Question

More Resources for Weaken Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Weaken questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers weaken questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Zach says

    March 6, 2025 at 1:59 pm

    The explanation for answer C is wrong. How could a painter use themselves as a live model? They’re painting, they can’t pose and look at themselves as they paint. If they used a mirror, they wouldn’t be posing for a battle scene. Are you imagining they took a photo of themselves posing and then painted that?

    In my view, answer C does weaken the argument but not as much as the correct answer D because C says “it was not uncommon,” rather than something stronger like painters almost always used live models (assuming the painter uses the models faces as well).

    Reply
    • Aaminah_LSATHacks says Tutor

      March 20, 2025 at 11:22 pm

      That’s a good critique, thank you! I’ve edited the explanation for C. Let me know if you still disagree or think it misses some nuances.

      Reply
  2. John says

    January 12, 2023 at 11:44 pm

    How would we know etiquette mattered to this guy at all?

    Reply
    • Graeme Blake says Founder

      March 1, 2023 at 12:34 pm

      We don’t. But this is a weaken question. You don’t have to destroy the question, instead you only have to weaken it. Making the insertion a breach of etiquette does reduce the odds it was done, because most people do obey etiquete.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms