LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 158 › Logical Reasoning › Question 13

LSAT 158 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q13

LSAT Preptest 158 explanations

LR Question 13 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Medical researcher: A new screening test detects certain polyps…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: The new test can lead to unnecessary, dangerous operations.

REASONING: The new test detects polyps that might not be malignant. Doctors remove polyps even if they aren’t malignant.

ANALYSIS: This feels like a good argument. When this happens on a necessary assumption question, look for a term in the conclusion that wasn’t mentioned in the stimulus. Here, the conclusion says the operations are unnecessary. Why? Because the polyps aren’t malignant.

But hold on: those aren’t the same things. The fact that a polyp isn’t malignant doesn’t necessarily mean it’s ok to leave the polyp in the body. Maybe it has other bad effects or could grow to become malignant later. The argument is assuming none of this true and the polyp removal is indeed unnecessary.

So as a prephrase, look for necessity. Only one answer does, so this kind of prephrase can help you go through answers very fast.

(In a medical context, a malignant growth generally means cancerous. But some non-malignant growths, for example non cancerous brain tumours, nonetheless need removal.)

___________

  1. We don’t care about what is ethically justified. This argument is factual, not moral.
  2. CORRECT. This matches our prephrase. If you negate this, the argument falls apart.
    Negation: It is always medically necessary to surgically remove nonmalignant polyps.
  3. This answer choice tells us what we should/shouldn’t do. This is incorrect: the LSAT makes a strict separation between facts and morals, and this question is a factual question.
  4. Like A and C, this answer is moral. It tells us what we should do, whereas the argument is about what is dangerous. You cannot switch from morals to facts on the LSAT!
  5. Do we know anything about “medically useful”? No! Eliminate. The test could be useful for giving all clear: negative results are often useful.

Recap: The question begins with “Medical researcher: A new screening test detects certain polyps”. It is a Necessary Assumption question. Learn how to master LSAT Necessary questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 158
Next Question
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms