LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 158 › Logical Reasoning › Question 3

LSAT 158 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q3

LSAT Preptest 158 explanations

LR Question 3 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Physician: We are constantly bombarded by warnings…

QUESTION TYPE: Role in Argument

CONCLUSION: Only conclusive results from definitive studies should be announced.

REASONING: We want people to abide by health warnings. If we’re bombarded by too many warnings, we end up ignoring them.

ANALYSIS: The physician illustrates the consequence of constant warnings by using the analogy of a fire alarm: if we constantly have fire drills, when the alarm finally goes off due to a real fire, we have a false sense of security and might ignore it. The physician is concerned that people will adopt a similar attitude towards medical warnings.

So, fire alarms are an analogy that supports the conclusion.

___________

  1. A fire drill definitely isn’t an example of a medical warning. It’s an analogy, not an example.
  2. The stimulus doesn’t mention the medical establishment’s motives.
     
    Example of statement: Doctors are greedy! They only publish to make money.
  3. CORRECT. The example of the fire drill is analogous to the physician’s warning that too many medical warnings would cause people to start ignoring them.
  4. The analogy is used to support the physician’s argument, not object to the argument’s conclusion. LSAT arguments generally don’t have space for an author to write a whole analogy against their position. (You’d need to have a position, an analogy against it, a rebuttal, and a reaffirmation of the position.)
  5. E mentions analogy, but it talks about an analogy used in a different way. The stimulus uses this analogy to show the consequences of a certain action, not to differentiate between initial and definitive studies.
     
    And….just think about what this answer is saying!! It is saying “The author mentions fire alarms to distinguish types of scientific studies”. That makes no sense. Fire alarms aren’t studies.

Recap: The question begins with “Physician: We are constantly bombarded by warnings”. It is a Role in Argument question. Learn how to master LSAT Role questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 158
Next Question

More Resources for Role in Argument Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Role in Argument questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers role in argument questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms