LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 158 › Logical Reasoning › Question 21

LSAT 158 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q21

LSAT Preptest 158 explanations

LR Question 21 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Professor: Many scientists hypothesize that there is…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: There is no reason to believe that the scientists’ “light-absorbing medium” hypothesis is correct.

REASONING: The scientists say that the medium would explain the low visibility of other systems from Earth. But general relativity already explains the low visibility.

ANALYSIS: The professor disputes that the hypothesis is necessary to explain the low visibility of other systems. They claim that relativity already fully explains that problem. But does that actually leave “no reason” to believe it is correct?

The correct answer, when negated, will wreck the argument. Here, we’ll use the negation test to find which answer is necessary.

___________

  1. The negation of this answer doesn’t break the argument. The author isn’t saying the hypothesis doesn’t explain it, but that it’s already explained.
    Negation: The low visibility of other systems is adequately explained by the “light-absorbing medium” hypothesis.
  2. Similar to answer A – the argument is not saying the hypothesis doesn’t explain the low visibility. The point is that it is unnecessary.
    Negation: The “light-absorbing medium” hypothesis can be correct even if it does not adequately explain the low visibility.
  3. This doesn’t matter – we don’t care what makes a hypothesis likely to be correct. Likely is a weak word, and the professor is arguing the opposite.
    Negation: A hypothesis is not likely to be correct if it adequately accounts for a phenomenon that isn’t already accounted for by an existed theory.
  4. This is irrelevant – it doesn’t matter to the argument if they accept it or not.
    Negation: Most scientists positing the hypothesis don’t accept the general theory of relativity.
  5. CORRECT. When we negate this, it ruins the argument. The author is relying on the theory of relativity being distinct from the “light-absorbing medium” hypothesis.
    Negation: The general theory of relativity depends on the “light-absorbing medium” hypothesis.

Recap: The question begins with “Professor: Many scientists hypothesize that there is”. It is a Necessary Assumption question. Learn how to master LSAT Necessary questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 158
Next Question
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms