LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › June 2007 LSAT Explanations (June 2007) › Logical Reasoning › Question 10

LSAT 123 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q10

LSAT Preptest 123 explanations

LR Question 10 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Advertisers have learned that people are more easily…

QUESTION TYPE: Complete the Argument

CONCLUSION: Advertisers are likely to link their products to things that people already like, using pictures. [Prephrased conclusion]

REASONING: Want to make people like a product? Link it to things they already like, with pictures!

ANALYSIS: The main trap answers assume prose (text) is bad. The argument didn’t say that!

It said pictures are good. That doesn’t mean that everything else is bad. A good ad might link a product with pictures, and use a written description.

If you thought the argument said “text is bad”, you need to consider whether you tend to view things in black and white terms, or typically view things as being in conflict.

___________

  1. This goes to far. We need pictures to make links, but that doesn’t mean text is useless.
  2. The stimulus didn’t talk about making ads with pictures of the product. It said ads should use pictures to link the product to something people like.
     
    This answer misunderstands the stimulus and thinks the pictures need to be of the product. “Products that can be represented pictorially” refers to representing the product itself with a picture.
  3. Why? Magazines have pictures.
  4. The argument didn’t mention competing products. It instead said to link your products with things people like.
  5. CORRECT. Finally. This says what the evidence said: if you want to make a people like a product, link it to things they already like, with pictures.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 123
Next Question

More Resources for Complete the Argument Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Complete the Argument questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers complete the argument questions.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms