Understand Every Answer!
June 2007 LSAT Explanations
Looking for a copy of June 2007 LSAT? See the list of LSAT preptests. <— June 2007 LSAT
Full explanations for every question from June 2007 LSAT, the June 2017 test. For free. What are you waiting for?
- Review on your own first.
- Have the question on hand.
- Draw the logic games diagrams yourself, on paper. You won’t learn much if you just follow along on screen.
Let me know what you think by commenting below the explanations! If you want these explanations offline, or want the whole test in one place, you can get a pdf version.
Note: Phones may not display this page well. I recommend a computer or tablet.
Section I
Logic Games
Game 1, Five Digit Product Code
Game 2, Film Club (Greed, Harvest, Limelight)
Game 3, Freedom Cruise Weeks
- Setup
- Main Diagram
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
Game 4, Rivertown Recycling Centers
Section II
Logical Reasoning
Section III
Logical Reasoning
Section IV
Reading Comprehension
Passage 1, Poetry and Fiction
- Passage Analysis
- Question 1
- Question 2
- Question 3
- Question 4
- Question 5
- Question 6
- Question 7
- Question 8
Passage 2, Music and Human Language (Comparative)
Passage 3, Web Copyright (Linking)
- Passage Analysis
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
Passage 4, Fossilized Pollen/Irish Landscape
PDF Version
Get a pdf version for the best formatting and offline use. Find pdfs of past tests as well.
Hi, I'm Graeme Blake
I run LSAT Hacks, and got a 177 on the LSAT. The single best thing I've ever made is the set of LSAT Mastery seminars. They show you how to think like a 170+ scorer when doing questions. Get them here: Mastery Seminars
I guarantee you'll like them, or you get your money back within 7 days. There's no risk. Check the reviews, people have said they improved within a few days.
---------
Photos and Updates: You can follow me on Instagram here
For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.
Hi, I’ve just started prepping for the LSAT and I was wondering what the average score for each section is. Basically, if you got a score of 21 out of 25 in section II of the June 2007 LSAT paper, how would this compare to the average? Thanks
So you should use the score scale in the test, and do it for all four sections together. The median on the LSAT is 151, but that’s after people have studied some. So, probably the average starting score is 145?
However, to get a score in the 160s, you’re at a more comfortable starting place if you start 150+
in section 2 Q4, why is boosting your ‘largest corporate rival’ not hostile?
In the context of this question (I’m assuming you’re talking about E) the hostility is being directed towards Danto’s own products. Criticizing Danto’s product does not necessarily mean that its corporate rival would be “boosted”. It could be that the report criticizes both Danto and Ocksenfrey’s products. The issue here is that the Consumer is making a link between the two companies: what the report might say about Danto’s products has no bearing on what it may say about others.
E is also wrong because the stimulus gives no indication if Danto would approve of the report criticizing its own products. The stimulus only says that because of Danto’s association with the report, the report is biased and thus false (which is the error it commits, hence A being the. Answer).
I’m not sure if this is where to post my question but i have a question about Section III question 3 of the june 2007 lsat . It’s a point of issue question. I chose C as the answer and in your explanations, you mentioned that C is a trap answer because Carolyn says that the work does not bear resemblance but Arnold does not say that.
I thought Arnold did though because he said “Quinn’s conceptual portrait is a maximally realistic portrait”, is it wrong to interpret this as bears resemblance because maximally realistic seems pretty close to bears resemblance to me.
For point at issue questions, it has to be something that both parties have an opinion on. At no point does Arnold dispute the fact that the portrait looks like Sulston or not. What they’re actually disagreeing on, is if something needs to bear a resemblance to the subject in order to be a portrait. Carolyn says yes; Arnold says no.