LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › June 2007 LSAT Explanations (June 2007) › Reading Comprehension › Passage 2

LSAT 123, Section 4, RC Passage 2, Music and Human Language

LSAT Preptest 123 explanations

RC Passage 2 Explanation (Comparative)

Paragraph Summaries

Passage A

  1. Music and language have some similarities. They may have emerged together.
  2. Music and language are part of the same sound processing system in the brain. They are like two different radio programs broadcast on the same hardware. However, while almost everyone can create language, only specialists can create music.
  3. Language is more important in humans, so we can assume that language was the main thing evolution selected for, and music evolved as a by-product.

Passage B

  1. Contrary to Darwin’s claim, music may have served an evolutionary purpose by allowing mothers to form emotional bonds with infants.
  2. Studies show that mothers and infants engage in mutual improvisations together. These are brief and use musical elements.
  3. These musical interactions can build emotional bonds which allow for a long period of maternal care and protection. This is necessary because humans are very helpless at birth and have a long period of brain development.

Analysis

Both passages talk about the possible evolutionary purpose of music. Passage A compares music and language. The following are important points:

  • Music and language developed together.
  • Language is something (almost) every human makes and understands.
  • Music is understood by almost all, but normally made only by specialists.
  • Language is more important than music, so it was probably what evolution selected for.

Passage B is just focussed on music. Its argument is that music actually did serve an evolutionarily necessary role: it helped mothers emotionally bond with infants during the long phase when infants are helpless and developing.

There’s not much overlap between the two passages. About the only intersection is that the author of passages A and B disagree on whether or not music has been evolutionarily useful for humans. A says no, B says yes.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 123
Next Question

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms