QUESTION TEXT: H. G. Wells’s great dramatic novel The Time Machine is …
QUESTION TYPE: Sufficient Assumption
CONCLUSION: The Time Machine should not be classified as science fiction.
REASONING: It has compelling characters, which great dramatic novels have, but science fiction generally lacks.
ANALYSIS: On sufficient assumption questions, you should look for a gap between the reasoning and conclusion. Usually, I recommend diagramming since a lot of them involve conditional reasoning. This argument does not, so instead you can think of it like this:
- The book has one trait common to science fiction (it’s set in the future)
- It also has a trait that aligns with great dramatic novels but is generally absent in science fiction (compelling characters)
- Therefore, it must not be science fiction
But why must that be the case? The argument assumes that a novel cannot belong to both genres at once. Without this assumption, the conclusion wouldn’t follow – The Time Machine could simply be both a great dramatic novel and a science fiction book.
___________
- The argument says that great dramatic novels generally have compelling characters, not that all novels with compelling characters are great dramatic novels. This would be like saying “everything with a tail is a cat” just because all cats generally have tails.
- It doesn’t rely on the assumption that all novels can always be neatly classified. It just raises a challenge to the classification of a specific novel.
- The argument never made any claims about what makes a work of science fiction great or not.
- The argument contrasts dramatic novels and science fiction based on character depth, but it never claimed that characters are the most important factor in a novel’s quality.
- CORRECT. The argument assumes that a novel cannot be both a great dramatic novel and a science fiction. Otherwise, The Time Machine could belong to both genres, contradicting the conclusion that it should not be classified as science fiction.

Leave a Reply