LSAT 156 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q7

LR Question 7 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: A truly visual art form – for example, painting – is one …

QUESTION TYPE: Must Be True

ANALYSIS: The passage draws a clear distinction between two types of art:

Visual art → no fixed order, no required duration
Temporal art → must be performed, fixed order and time

So performance is tied to temporal art, not visual art. That means if something is a “truly visual” art form, it cannot require performance in that essential way.

This is a clean definition-based inference. You’re not adding anything new—you’re just following how the categories are defined.

___________

1. CORRECT. This follows directly: if visual art does not require performance, then truly visual art forms do not essentially involve performance.
2. Not supported. The passage compares poetry to both music and painting but doesn’t rank similarity between them.
3. Too strong. The passage distinguishes them but doesn’t say they can never overlap.
4. Too broad. Something might take time to understand without requiring a fixed order or performance.
5. Unsupported. The passage doesn’t limit all performable things to music or poetry.