LSAT 17 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q3

LR Question 3 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: The current move to patent computer programs is a move…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: The current move to patent computer programs should be stopped.

REASONING: The original motive of the patent system was to protect small time inventors from exploitation. Any computer program is just the use of a methodology. Patenting computer programs gives large corporations control over methodologies.

ANALYSIS: The argument supports its conclusion in two ways. First, patenting computer programs goes against the original intent of patents. Second, a computer program is just the implementation of a methodology.

The correct answer helps establish the second justification.

___________

1. It doesn’t matter who develops the programs. The argument doesn’t think we should be able to patent computer programs.
2. This sounds tempting but it isn’t a necessary assumption. Even if a methodology demanded a lot of creative effort the stimulus is still against large corporations getting control of methodologies.
3. Even if the problems have arisen in the past that does not diminish the force of the argument. Perhaps the problems are worse now.
4. CORRECT. If we negate this we get “it’s alright for large corporations to hold patents for the implementation of methodologies.” That wrecks the main argument.
5. Suppose that some small time inventors were able to benefit from computer patents. How would that hurt the argument? It still argues against large corporations being allowed to patent methodologies.

Recap: The question begins with “The current move to patent computer programs is a move”. It is a Necessary Assumption question. Learn how to master LSAT Necessary questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.