QUESTION TEXT: Carl: Researchers who perform operations on animals…
QUESTION TYPE: Method of Reasoning
CONCLUSION: Debbie thinks humans don’t need pain protocols.
REASONING: A surgeon can simply explain to a human what’s involved in the operation, and then the human can decide whether to have surgery.
ANALYSIS: Debbie adds new information that shows human surgeries are different from animal surgeries. Humans can understand what an operation will involve and consent.
___________
- Which claim does Debbie disagrees with? She just adds new information.
- CORRECT. Humans can consent to an operation. Animals can’t.
- Debbie doesn’t say anything like this. Don’t pick answers that have no support from the stimulus.
- Debbie doesn’t make an analogy. She offers an example. Those are different. An analogy would talk about something other than human surgeries.
- Actually, Debbie does think she can disprove Carl’s conclusion. She thinks pain protocols are unnecessary.
Free Logical Reasoning lesson
Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions
Leave a Reply