LSAT 21, Reading Comprehension, Q24, LSATHacks

RC Question 24 Explanation, by LSATHacks

DISCUSSION: The author seems to agree with Tollefson. Their only criticism is that Tollefson’s recommendations should have been stronger.

(lines 59-62)

We also know that Tollefson’s study is fairly unique.

(lines 4-7)

___________

1. The author never says that Tollefson is
   incorrect (misguided).
2. CORRECT. Lines 4-7 show that Tollefson’s study is new and different. The criticism from lines 59-62 shows that the author thinks Tollefson could have made better recommendations.
3. There’s no contradiction mentioned.
4. We don’t know whether anyone appreciates Tollefson’s critique. Maybe many people do.
5. Lines 4-7 contradict this: Tollefson’s critique is different and new.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.