LSAT 21 | Section 4 | Reading Comprehension: Q24

RC Question 24 Explanation

DISCUSSION: The author seems to agree with Tollefson. Their only criticism is that Tollefson’s recommendations should have been stronger.

(lines 59-62)

We also know that Tollefson’s study is fairly unique.

(lines 4-7)

___________

1. The author never says that Tollefson is incorrect (misguided).
2. CORRECT. Lines 4-7 show that Tollefson’s study is new and different. The criticism from lines 59-62 shows that the author thinks Tollefson could have made better recommendations.
3. There’s no contradiction mentioned.
4. We don’t know whether anyone appreciates Tollefson’s critique. Maybe many people do.
5. Lines 4-7 contradict this: Tollefson’s critique is different and new.