DISCUSSION: The passage starts by introducing outcomes analysis. Then they criticize it in detail in the second paragraph. The third paragraph presents two better techniques.
___________
- CORRECT. The first paragraph introduces outcomes analysis. The second paragraph criticizes it. The third paragraph presents two better theories.
- There’s no evidence of a debate between traditional theorists and those who use social science. And the final paragraph doesn’t show a compromise between any theories.
- These terms are completely off-base. The author describes a technique, not a theory.
They criticize the theory, rather than clarify.
And the author tells us about two other theories; they don’t present a plan. - There are no standards in the first paragraph. The second paragraph doesn’t mention any examples. The third paragraph introduces other techniques, it doesn’t amend any criteria.
- This is almost right. But it’s a technique that’s being challenged, not a position.
And the final paragraph presents two other techniques. The author doesn’t revise the challenge they made against outcomes analysis.
Want a free Reading Comp lesson?
Get a free sample of the Reading Comprehension Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving RC questions
Leave a Reply